Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 32 |
Descriptor
Institutional Characteristics | 37 |
Student Subcultures | 37 |
Middle Schools | 31 |
Accountability | 30 |
Comparative Analysis | 30 |
Disabilities | 30 |
Educational Improvement | 30 |
Educational Indicators | 30 |
English (Second Language) | 30 |
Federal Legislation | 30 |
Federal Programs | 30 |
More ▼ |
Source
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 29 |
British Journal of Sociology… | 1 |
Current Issues in Education | 1 |
History of Higher Education | 1 |
Journal of Diversity in… | 1 |
Journal of Early Adolescence | 1 |
Vestes | 1 |
Author
Astin, Alexander W. | 1 |
Baker, Sally | 1 |
Brown, B. | 1 |
Bukowski, William M. | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Garcia, Crystal E. | 1 |
Geiger, Robert L., Ed. | 1 |
Hardy, Cindy L. | 1 |
Martin, Peter Clyde | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 29 |
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Collected Works - Serials | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Middle Schools | 30 |
Elementary Education | 29 |
Grade 3 | 29 |
Grade 4 | 29 |
Grade 5 | 29 |
Grade 6 | 29 |
Grade 7 | 29 |
Grade 8 | 29 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 27 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 2 |
California | 2 |
Colorado | 2 |
Delaware | 2 |
Florida | 2 |
Georgia | 2 |
Idaho | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Indiana | 2 |
Kansas | 2 |
Maine | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 30 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Garcia, Crystal E. – Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2020
This qualitative, multiple case study explored the role of involvement in a particular university subculture, Latina/o sororities and fraternities, in how Latina/o college students develop and make meaning of their sense of belonging within predominantly White institutions. Findings address ways Latina/o college students described their…
Descriptors: Group Membership, Interpersonal Relationship, Whites, Institutional Characteristics
Martin, Peter Clyde – Current Issues in Education, 2011
This article discusses how the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) accountability mechanism of No Child Left Behind makes use of supposedly objective standardized test scores to describe schools in a certain way when the very same results could serve to draw very different conclusions. Examining the proficiency scores of students from a specific middle…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Accountability, Educational Indicators
Baker, Sally; Brown, B. – British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2007
Here, the narratives of a group of non-traditional students who entered traditional UK universities are examined. A number of participants felt there was a kind of romance or exotic quality to the sights, sounds and smells of traditional institutions, which constituted part of the attraction. The process of becoming a student at an elite or…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Personal Narratives, Nontraditional Students, College Admission
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
York, Barry – Vestes, 1984
Several theories about student unrest in the late 1960s and early 1970s are noted, and the situation and student population of La Trobe University at the time are described. It is proposed that the unrest was both an outgrowth of the political climate and a developmental experience for the individual students. (MSE)
Descriptors: Activism, Administrator Attitudes, College Role, Demonstrations (Civil)
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs