NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 35 results Save | Export
Clark, Elvis G.; Davis, Archie D. – 1981
The T-Note system is an easy way for students to take notes, is organized for effective review, and is adaptable because it provides a system for recording five types of information typically presented in the classroom. The student first divides a single loose-leaf notebook page vertically down the middle, and horizontally about one or two inches…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Reading, Review (Reexamination), Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Palmatier, Robert A. – Journal of Reading, 1973
Introduces the notetaking system for learning, designed to help high school and college students prepare for objective and essay tests. (RB)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Processes, Review (Reexamination), Secondary Education
Kardash, CarolAnne M.; Kroeker, Tirza L. – 1988
Research has shown that students who take notes remember more than do students who do not take notes, and that test performance is enhanced for students who are given an opportunity to review their notes compared to those who are not. However, research has not offered instructors and students specific guidelines regarding when review of notes in…
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Notetaking, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Francis, J.C. – Educational Studies, 1981
Examines the relationship of study techniques and test-taking strategies to success on the "O" level of the British General Certificate of Education (GCE) examination. Findings showed that teachers and students felt that course reviews, including study of past examinations, was the best preparation. (AM)
Descriptors: Comparative Education, Educational Research, Higher Education, Review (Reexamination)
Lindner, Reinhard W.; And Others – 1996
Two experiments were conducted to investigate whether the strategy of differentiating main and supporting ideas with different colored highlighter pens resulted in greater use of schema building and increased recall of information by students and whether the benefits of text marking come at the time of encoding or at the time of review. Sixty-six…
Descriptors: Attention, College Students, Higher Education, Recall (Psychology)
Beecher, Jeff – 1988
Researchers have long debated on whether note-taking results in improved student performance on tests. Over the years, researchers have tried to verify that note-taking helps students "encode" the information involved and that notes are valuable as materials for review. C. C. Crawford's 1925 study concluded that taking notes was better…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Encoding (Psychology), Higher Education, Learning Strategies
Van Matre, Nicholas H.; Carter, John F. – 1975
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of note taking and review on retention of information presented by lecture. One hundred seventy-two undergraduates enrolled in an introductory psychology course served as subjects for the experiment. All subjects listened to a lecture while engaging in study strategies consisting of…
Descriptors: College Students, Educational Research, Higher Education, Lecture Method
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barnett, Jerrold E.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of note taking and reviewing on learning from text. The findings supported the encoding function of note taking and demonstrated that unguided elaboration hindered performance on teacher-made tests. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Learning Activities, Learning Processes, Performance Factors
Annis, Linda; Davis, J. Kent – 1977
Field-independent and field-dependent college students studied a 1525-word article under a preferred or nonpreferred study condition (read only, underline, or note taking). Half of the subjects reviewed the material prior to an examination and half did not. Results indicated that field-independent subjects who used a nonpreferred study technique…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Higher Education, Learning Processes, Memory
Hartley, James; Marshall, Susan – Universities Quarterly, 1974
Recommendations include: (1) Students need guidance in note-taking and study habits; (2) Lectures should be improved to make note-taking easier; and (3) Handouts are essential to provide students with terms, references, and a clear outline of the lecture. (Author/PG)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Educational Research, Higher Education, International Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dyer, James W.; And Others – Journal of Educational Research, 1979
Notetaking and rereading improved college students' recall of text material, but summarizing passages without reference to the original text did not. (Editor)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Higher Education, Learning Activities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Knaus, Ronald M. – American Biology Teacher, 1977
Suggests unorthodox methods that may help to make studying more agreeable to students. Discussed are organizing complex cheat notes, use of chalkboard on pretending to give lectures on the subject to be mastered, developing an appreciation ("psyching out") for the professor's philosophy, and using flash cards for vocabulary mastery. (CS)
Descriptors: Biology, College Science, Higher Education, Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huffman, Lois E. – Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 1996
Describes "Review in the Round," a student-centered review process that combines discussion and cooperative learning. Describes its purposes, preparation (outside class), and the review procedure. (SR)
Descriptors: Class Activities, Content Area Reading, Cooperative Learning, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
King, Alison – American Educational Research Journal, 1992
Self-questioning, summarizing, and review of lecture notes were compared as strategies for learning from lectures for 56 underprepared college students. Subjects were randomly assigned to self-questioning (19 students), summarizing (19 students), and notetaking-review (18 students) conditions. Self-questioners performed better than summarizers and…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kiewra, Kenneth A.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
Note-taking functions (encoding, encoding plus storage, and storage) and note-taking techniques (conventional, linear, and matrix) were studied for 96 college undergraduates. Results are explained in relation to repetition, generative processing, note completeness, and the potential of note-taking techniques to facilitate performance. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Encoding (Psychology), Higher Education, Lecture Method
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3