NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carniel, Jessica; Hickey, Andrew; Southey, Kim; Brömdal, Annette; Crowley-Cyr, Lynda; Eacersall, Douglas; Farmer, Will; Gehrmann, Richard; Machin, Tanya; Pillay, Yosheen – Research Ethics, 2023
Ethics review processes are frequently perceived as extending from codes and protocols rooted in biomedical disciplines. As a result, many researchers in the humanities and social sciences (HASS) find these processes to be misaligned, if not outrightly obstructive to their research. This leads some scholars to advocate against HASS participation…
Descriptors: Ethics, Humanities, Social Sciences, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wood, Lesley; Kahts-Kramer, Samantha – Research Ethics, 2023
Many reviewers of applications for ethical approval of research at universities struggle to understand what is considered ethical conduct in community-based research (CBR). Their difficulty in understanding CBR and the ethics embedded within it is, in part, due to the exclusion of CBR from researchers' mandatory research ethics training. After…
Descriptors: Ethics, Misconceptions, African American Community, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fletcher, James Rupert – Research Ethics, 2021
This paper considers the potential for the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) of England and Wales to incentivise the exclusion of people with dementia from research. The MCA is intended to standardise and safeguard the inclusion of people with cognitive impairments in research. This entails various procedural requirements, which in pressurised research…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Public Policy, Dementia, Research