Descriptor
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Judges | 2 |
| Oral Interpretation | 2 |
| Pilot Projects | 2 |
| Communication Research | 1 |
| Communication Skills | 1 |
| Content Analysis | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Debate Format | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Research Needs | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Jensen, Gina | 2 |
Publication Type
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Judges as the Centrality of Forensics: An Examination of Norms & Training in Forensics Adjudication.
Download full textJensen, Gina – 1997
A pilot study analyzed oral interpretation ballots collected at two college forensics tournaments to determine the average number and classifications of comments on the ballots. A total of 1,737 comments from 304 ballots of oral interpretation events (prose, poetry, program, duo, and dramatic) were analyzed. Results indicated a mean of 5.71…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education
Jensen, Gina – 1997
A pilot study examined the kinds of comments made on oral interpretation ballots and whether the comments suggest a useful criteria for an effective oral interpretation performance. A total of 1,737 comments were recorded from 304 ballots from two forensics tournaments. Classifications of comments were created as ballots were analyzed. A total of…
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Content Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
