NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gordon, Virginia N.; Grites, Thomas J. – NACADA Journal, 1998
Traces the history and content of the NACADA (National Academic Advising Association) Journal through an analysis of the content of its 33 published issues, including number and length of articles, type of author(s), methodologies, and references cited. Prominent advising themes and trends are revealed. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Advising, Authors, Citations (References), Content Analysis
Luey, Beth – 1995
This guide provides an overview of the academic publishing process and advice to prospective authors in academe on how to have their work published. Individual chapters focus on: (1) the author-publisher partnership; (2) finding an appropriate journal, submitting an effective manuscript, and speeding up the refereeing process; (3) revising a…
Descriptors: Authors, Books, Doctoral Dissertations, Editing
Livingston, Lynn W., Ed.; Bahr, Alice Harrison, Comp.; McLane, Michael J., Comp. – 1997
Directed specifically to the needs of college librarians, this book addresses publishing opportunities for aspiring writers at all levels, from graduate students and entry-level staff to experienced directors and researchers. It includes journals that cover areas of concern in small academic libraries as well as those focused on issues at larger…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Authors, Book Reviews, Faculty Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Borer, Douglas A. – PS: Political Science and Politics, 1997
Recounts one professor's discouraging experience with the process of submitting articles for publication in prestigious peer reviewed journals. Notes the wide disparity in comments from the reviewers ranging from corrective and helpful to condescending and dismissive. Detailed responses from the editors appear duplicitous and confusing. (MJP)
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Criticism, Editing, Educational Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meier, Kenneth J. – PS: Political Science and Politics, 1997
Responds to recent scathing criticism of the peer review process of scholarly publishing. Identifies three main problems with reviewers and editors: unresponsiveness, inconsistency, and indecisiveness. Discusses the pros and cons of several proposed publishing reforms including multiple submissions, establishing clearer and more consistent…
Descriptors: Codes of Ethics, Criticism, Editors, Educational Practices