NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)2
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 16 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M.; Nassrallah, Flora; Vos, Bénédicte; Whittingham, JoAnne; Fitzpatrick, Jessica – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 2020
Purpose: This study investigated progressive hearing loss in a cohort of children who were identified with permanent mild bilateral hearing loss. Method: This population-based study included 207 children with permanent mild bilateral hearing loss, diagnosed and followed from 2003 to 2016 in 1 region of Canada. Clinical characteristics and initial…
Descriptors: Hearing Impairments, Clinical Diagnosis, Longitudinal Studies, Risk
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jacob-Corteletti, Lilian Cássia Bórnia; Silva Araújo, Eliene; Luciene Duarte, Josilene; Zucki, Fernanda; de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2018
Purpose: The aims of the study were to examine the acoustic reflex screening and threshold in healthy neonates and those at risk of hearing loss and to determine the effect of birth weight and gestational age on acoustic stapedial reflex (ASR). Method: We assessed 18 healthy neonates (Group I) and 16 with at least 1 risk factor for hearing loss…
Descriptors: Acoustics, Neonates, Auditory Tests, Screening Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Durante, Alessandra Spada; Carvallo, Renata Mota Mamede – Journal of Communication Disorders, 2008
To investigate the transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) contralateral suppression in neonates at risk for hearing loss, 55 neonates at risk for hearing loss (risk group) and 72 full-term neonates not at such risk (control group) were bilaterally tested. In all neonates, the TEOAE were recorded in two stimulation modes (linear and…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Stimulation, Hearing (Physiology), Hearing Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weirather, Yusnita; Korth, Nancy; White, Karl R.; Woods-Kershner, Nancy; Downs, Diane – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1997
After reviewing the extant literature, this article describes a cost analysis of the transient evoked otoaoustic emissions (TEOAE)-based universal newborn hearing screening program. Reasons why the cost per baby ($7.42) is lower than in previous reports are explained and the benefits of having accurate cost analysis data are summarized. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Cost Effectiveness, Cost Estimates, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Widen, Judith E.; Bull, R. Warren; Folsom, Richard C. – Infants and Young Children, 2003
This article describes hearing screening procedures and discusses implications and limitations of passing screening tests, being referred for rescreening, and failing the test. Follow-up intervention and evaluation that may be needed for children with hearing loss are discussed, and practical advice for professionals involved with screening and…
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shannon, Dorothy A.; And Others – Pediatrics, 1984
The brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) was evaluated as a hearing screening test in 168 high-risk newborns. The BAEP was found to be a sensitive procedure for the early identification of hearing-impaired newborns. However, the yield of significant hearing abnormalities was less than predicted in other studies using BAEP. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Disability Identification, Early Identification, Followup Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stuart, Andrew; Yang, Edward Y. – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1994
Simultaneous 3- channel recorded auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were obtained from 20 neonates with various high-pass filter settings and low intensity levels. Results support the advocacy of less restrictive high-pass filtering for neonatal and infant ABR screening to air-conducted and bone-conducted clicks. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Auditory Evaluation, Auditory Tests, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Young, Alys; Andrews, Elizabeth – Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2001
A review of the literature reporting effects on parents of universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) focuses on debates surrounding false positive identification, the evidence base for maternal/parental anxiety, consent, and family cultural/sociodemographic influences on the effective implementation of the UNHS programs, especially the pilot…
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Disability Identification, Family Attitudes, Family Influence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maxon, Antonia Brancia; White, Karl R.; Culpepper, Brandt; Vohr, Betty R. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1997
Describes factors that can affect the referral rate for otoacoustic emission-based newborn hearing screening and discusses the screening results of 1,328 newborns screened with transient evoked otoaoustic emissions prior to hospital discharge. The youngest infants were as likely to pass as infants who were 24-27 hours old. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Tests, Evaluation Methods, Hearing Impairments
NIH Consensus Statement, 1993
This consensus statement on early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children was developed by a nonadvocate, non-Federal panel of 58 experts during a 3-day meeting in 1993. The panel concluded that: (1) all infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit should be screened for hearing loss prior to discharge; (2)…
Descriptors: Audiology, Auditory Evaluation, Auditory Tests, Disability Identification
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Minnesota State Dept. of Health, St. Paul. – 1996
This manual describes the screening procedures used to identify infants and children in need of further diagnosis and treatment for hearing loss in Minnesota. It is intended for use by Community Health Service agencies, school health programs, Head Start agencies, and voluntary agencies, and should be used as a post-training reference. Newborn…
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Check Lists, Disability Identification, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mauk, Gary W.; And Others – Infant-Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal, 1995
The importance of early identification of hearing loss in children and progress toward newborn screening is discussed, along with consequences of delayed identification. The history and status of early screening at national and state levels and specific types of screening methods for bilateral and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss are…
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Early Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mauk, Gary W.; White, Karl R. – Volta Review, 1995
This article addresses the need for very early identification of hearing loss; summarizes federal and state government involvement in early identification of hearing loss; compares common screening methods; explains the use of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) with newborns; reviews existing TEOAE screening programs; and urges…
Descriptors: Auditory Evaluation, Auditory Tests, Community Programs, Disability Identification
White, Karl R.; Mauk, Gary W. – 1993
The goal of this project was to increase by 50 percent the number of children with significant hearing impairment identified by 12 months of age. Attainment of this goal was attempted through activities in three major areas: (1) replication and documentation of the benefits of a birth certificate-based screening system; (2) investigation of the…
Descriptors: Acoustics, At Risk Persons, Auditory Evaluation, Auditory Tests
Mauk, Gary W. – 1994
While the commitment to technology for neonatal and infant hearing screening in this country has come a long way and is evolving rapidly, the average age of 18-30 months, at which young children with auditory disabilities are identified, is still unacceptable. The promise of earlier detection, diagnosis, and habilitation of hearing loss is within…
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Auditory Tests, Change Strategies, Child Advocacy
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2