Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 11 |
Descriptor
Group Testing | 68 |
Testing | 68 |
Individual Testing | 16 |
Intelligence Tests | 13 |
Test Construction | 12 |
Test Reliability | 12 |
Testing Problems | 12 |
Educational Testing | 11 |
Test Validity | 11 |
Testing Programs | 10 |
Student Evaluation | 9 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 3 |
Teachers | 3 |
Administrators | 2 |
Location
New Jersey | 3 |
Canada | 2 |
California | 1 |
Israel | 1 |
Italy | 1 |
Netherlands (Amsterdam) | 1 |
South Africa | 1 |
Spain (Valencia) | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Wisconsin | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rayne Bozeman; Robyn K. Mallett; Linas Mitchell; R. Scott Tindale – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2024
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test…
Descriptors: Testing, Group Testing, Cooperative Learning, Learning Experience
Rogers, W. Todd – Canadian Journal of Education, 2014
Principals and teachers do not use large-scale assessment results because the lack of distinct and reliable subtests prevents identifying strengths and weaknesses of students and instruction, the results arrive too late to be used, and principals and teachers need assistance to use the results to improve instruction so as to improve student…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Group Testing, Multidimensional Scaling, Evaluation Utilization
Bennett, Rita – ELT Journal, 2012
This study looks at the real and perceived effects of inter-candidate variation in linguistic ability during pair-tested oral examinations in a southern Italian context. Pair testing has not been taken up in schools and universities in southern Italy despite its wide use in international testing systems. Colleagues and prospective candidates often…
Descriptors: Test Results, Linguistics, Oral Language, Testing
Hanshaw, Larry G. – College Student Journal, 2012
This study sought to determine how students would describe their group-only cooperative testing experiences in terms of key elements of cooperative learning often cited in the literature. Written comments of 159 graduate students were analyzed and 26 related categories of comments were derived from 495 statements of students enrolled in two…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Cooperative Learning, Teaching Methods, Graduate Students
Jaime Pastor, Asuncion; Perez Guillot, Cristina; Candel-Mora, Miguel A. – Language Learning in Higher Education, 2012
One of the main problems relating to language courses offered at language centres is measuring the students' entry-level skills in a fast, efficient and reliable way. This problem is particularly acute in language centres with large numbers of students, especially at the beginning of the academic year, as a mechanism has to be implemented which…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Student Placement, Prior Learning, Computer Assisted Testing
Howie, Sarah – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2012
The Jomtien conference in 1990 on Education for All is seen by many as a turning point for the introduction of increased monitoring and evaluation of the quality of education systems around the world. Internationally, debates have arisen about the nature and frequency of assessment and its impact on education systems with its intended and…
Descriptors: Test Use, Testing, High Stakes Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Looney, Janet W. – OECD Publishing (NJ1), 2011
A long-held ambition for many educators and assessment experts has been to integrate summative and formative assessments so that data from external assessments used for system monitoring may also be used to shape teaching and learning in classrooms. In turn, classroom-based assessments may provide valuable data for decision makers at school and…
Descriptors: Research and Development, Formative Evaluation, Testing, Summative Evaluation
Gibson, H. B. – J Clin Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Group Testing, Motor Reactions, Personality Assessment, Socioeconomic Background
Hancock, Dawson R. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2007
This study explored the impact of individual versus two-person group testing on graduate students' achievement and motivation to learn while enrolled in a 16-lesson educational research methods course. Students in two sections of the course were exposed to the same content and instructional methods, with one exception: students in one section took…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Test Items, Learning Motivation, Group Testing
Hamel, Ronald; Schmittmann, Verena D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
The Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test (APM) is a well-known measure of higher order general mental ability. The time to administer the test, 40 to 60 minutes, is sometimes regarded as a drawback. To meet efficiency needs, the APM can be administered as a 30-or 40-minute timed test, or one of two developed short versions could be used. In…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Cognitive Ability, Group Testing, Timed Tests
Hurren, B. Lee; Rutledge, Matt; Garvin, Amanda Burcham – Phi Delta Kappan, 2006
Why do creative teachers who want to help all their students learn in meaningful ways have to use high-pressure testing methods that work against that goal? The authors propose a system of testing that serves the need for evaluation while contributing to students' intellectual and social growth. (Contains 7 endnotes.)
Descriptors: Testing, School Readiness, Test Anxiety, Educational Strategies

Jacobs, Jon C. – Psychology in the Schools, 1971
Administration of the BG in a group situation provided as much, and as reliable, information as did individual administration. Besides the economy, it provided an opportunity to observe the individual child's functioning as a member of a peer group, both in relation to it and in conjunction with it. (Author)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Intelligence Tests

Lasch, Lynn D.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1974
Found that scores of MPDs obtained in groups did not differ from MPD scores obtained individually. Results suggest that individual norms may be utilized for scores in the group administration of the MPD, although replication with a larger sample is required to confirm the results. (Author/PC)
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Group Testing, Norms, Perceptual Motor Coordination

Buktenica, Norman A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Education, Group Testing, Identification, Learning Disabilities

Pfeffer, W. F.; And Others – American Mathematical Monthly, 1979
A description is given of an experiment on methods of testing, conducted with a mathematics course at University of California - Davis. (PK)
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Educational Testing, Group Testing, Mathematics Education