NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 458 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eva Barlösius; Laura Paruschke; Axel Philipps – Research Evaluation, 2023
Peer review has developed over time to become the established procedure for assessing and assuring the scientific quality of research. Nevertheless, the procedure has also been variously criticized as conservative, biased, and unfair, among other things. Do scientists regard all these flaws as equally problematic? Do they have the same opinions on…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Grantsmanship, Research Projects, Grants
Jeffrey Wayne Elias – APA Books, 2024
Scientific research relies on funding, and everyone who conducts research must become adept at funding their research. This book explains how to attain the number one source of research funding: grants. Readers will learn how to prepare grant proposals, how and when to interact with funding institutions, how to interpret and respond to peer review…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Program Proposals, Scientific Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jessica L. Schiller; Steven D. LeMire – Journal of Research Administration, 2023
Research universities and the federal government partner to foster societal, scientific, and technological advancements, but the federal research grant process is criticized for its procedural inefficiencies. Principal investigators and research administrators lament losing time to bureaucratic regulations, unwieldy processes, and burgeoning…
Descriptors: Research Administration, Federal Aid, Grants, Grantsmanship
Johnson, Sophie – ProQuest LLC, 2022
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the matching requirement of the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) grant is an arbitrary administrative stipulation of the grant or whether it adds meaningful value to the program. If the GEAR UP grant's matching requirement is a detriment to the program,…
Descriptors: College Readiness, Undergraduate Study, Program Administration, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Melani W. Duffrin; Kellie M. Dyslin; Luke Sebby; Jasmina Mesic; Chris Duffrin; Lynda Ransdell; Dara Little; Gerald C. Blazey – Journal of Research Administration, 2024
Emerging Research Institutions (ERIs) are notably one of the most impactful organizations in a state system for addressing social mobility, workforce development, and economic growth of a region. Cultivating research at ERIs often requires the faculty to expand their skill sets beyond basic research to engage students and communities. Faculty…
Descriptors: Research Universities, Faculty Development, Writing Workshops, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pifer, Meghan J. – New Directions for Higher Education, 2021
Across disciplines, mid-career faculty may be motivated by internal and external factors to pursue financial support for their work. Yet, it is unclear how mid-career faculty navigate individualized realities to develop the necessary skills for success in this aspect of their careers. This chapter guides the reader through planning for the pursuit…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Financial Support, Grants, Grantsmanship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Yaun, Katherine M.; Reiser, Robert A.; Walker, Reddick R.; Mesa, Michael P. – Research Management Review, 2020
The purpose of this paper is to describe how a college-level research office has used a variety of services and tools to increase faculty grant activity. A dozen practices will be discussed. Results indicate that the grant dollars received in the most recent fiscal year (FY2019-2020) are almost 150% higher than in the year before these practices…
Descriptors: Grants, College Faculty, Research Administration, Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Goff-Albritton, Rachel A.; Cola, Philip A.; Pierre, Judy; Yerra, Sandhya D.; Garcia, Isabella – Journal of Research Administration, 2022
Research development in higher education is a service-delivery system. In any service field, when choosing appropriate services, practitioners should reach for 'evidence-based practices.' Limited empirical research has addressed the preferences of research faculty regarding research support services. In this project, we sought to provide research…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty, Barriers, Affordances
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Falk, Martin Thomas; Hagsten, Eva – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2021
This study investigates the potential of European universities as hosts for Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) grantees. Factors explaining both the probability of a university hosting an MSCA grantee and its extent are estimated using a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model. Results reveal that the probability of hosting MSCA…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Grants, Grantsmanship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yousoubova, Larissa; McAlpine, Lynn – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2022
With current constraints of public funding of research the question of principal investigator (PI) success has gained prominence. Yet understanding grant success remains problematic. While often associated with peer acceptance of the proposal text, research fundability in large part is informed by PI participation in the social systems of research…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Program Proposals, Proposal Writing
Jennifer Betancourt Peterson – ProQuest LLC, 2022
The COVID-19 pandemic was a unique phenomenon that significantly impacted higher education. Programmatic grants were an important source of funding at community colleges during this unusual time, helping to provide vital resources and support services to institutions and their students. This study is one of the first of its kind to explore the…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Grants, Sustainability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Polasky, Sarah; Wilson, Jeannie; Carsen, JulieAnna; Stover, Lillian; Cowley, Shelby; Nielsen, Ann – Research Management Review, 2023
The impact of resubmission assistance on grant proposal success is relatively unknown. Given that a significant proportion of proposals, up to 90%, are rejected by the sponsor, this lack of information makes it difficult for Research Development (RD) professionals to decide whether to invest resources in this service. This study responded to New…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Research and Development, Program Proposals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ives, Jillian; Drayton, Brian; Hobbs, Kathryn; Falk, Joni – Education and Information Technologies, 2023
This qualitative case study examined how a multimodal professional network environment (STEM for all Video Showcase) affected five STEM educational researchers' capacity to engage in grant funded research at U.S. Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Guided by the social capital and professional network literature as a conceptual…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Networks, Researchers, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pupik Dean, Christopher G.; Schein, Maggie; Kang, Sheena; Kidd, David; Webb, Mel; Doyle, Annie Walton; Allen, Danielle – Teachers College Record, 2020
Background/Context: In recent years, the humanities have frequently been described as "under attack" or "in crisis" in both popular media and academic writing. In this climate, it is particularly critical to develop a stronger understanding of the value of the humanities. While there are many theoretical arguments about their…
Descriptors: Humanities, Learning Theories, Grantsmanship, Grants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Marshall, Stefanie L.; Salter, Amy O. – Science Education, 2022
This essay centers on the voices of leading scholars in science and STEM education on how equity can and should be centered in reviewing proposals for granting organizations. As the decisions made as a result of the reviewing process significantly impact the future directions of the field, we recognize the urgency in considering how equity is…
Descriptors: Science Education, STEM Education, Grants, Grantsmanship
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  31