Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Bailey, Daniel | 1 |
Bonner, Euan | 1 |
Chutinan Noobutra | 1 |
Frazier, Erin | 1 |
Giles, Timothy D. | 1 |
Ifan Iskandar | 1 |
Ivers, Patrick | 1 |
Lee, Andrea Rakushin | 1 |
Lee, Sangmin-Michelle | 1 |
Lege, Ryan | 1 |
Ninuk Lustyantie | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Indonesia | 1 |
South Korea | 1 |
Thailand | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Parlindungan Pardede; Ninuk Lustyantie; Ifan Iskandar – Journal of English Teaching, 2023
Over the last decades, applied linguistics and language teaching/learning have investigated language errors committed by learners for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Initially, error analysis was conducted manually and involved a limited number of corpus. However, computer software advancement has facilitated much larger amounts of data…
Descriptors: Error Analysis (Language), English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
UK Department for Education, 2024
This report sets out the findings of the technical development work completed as part of the Use Cases for Generative AI in Education project, commissioned by the Department for Education (DfE) in September 2023. It has been published alongside the User Research Report, which sets out the findings from the ongoing user engagement activity…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Computer Software, Computational Linguistics
Lee, Sangmin-Michelle – ReCALL, 2022
The use of machine translation (MT) in the academic context has increased in recent years. Hence, language teachers have found it difficult to ignore MT, which has led to some concerns. Among the concerns, its accuracy has become a major factor that shapes language teachers' pedagogical decision to use MT in their language classrooms. Despite the…
Descriptors: Translation, Grammar, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Chutinan Noobutra – LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 2024
The present study investigates whether or not Thai students' English writing skills can be improved by using an online grammar checker. First, typical syntactic errors made by undergraduate students majoring in English and English for Careers were examined. Secondly, possible reasons for syntactic errors in English writing in the light of Lado's…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Native Language, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Bonner, Euan; Lege, Ryan; Frazier, Erin – Teaching English with Technology, 2023
Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful type of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that simulates how humans organize language and are able to interpret, predict, and generate text. This allows for contextual understanding of natural human language which enables the LLM to understand conversational human input and respond in a natural manner. Recent…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Artificial Intelligence, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Bailey, Daniel; Lee, Andrea Rakushin – TESOL International Journal, 2020
Different genres of writing entail various levels of syntactic and lexical complexity, and how this complexity influences the results of Automatic Writing Evaluation (AWE) programs like Grammarly in second language (L2) writing is unknown. This study explored the use of Grammarly in the L2 writing context by comparing error frequency, error types…
Descriptors: Grammar, Computer Assisted Instruction, Error Correction, Feedback (Response)
Ivers, Patrick – Computers, Reading and Language Arts, 1984
Illustrates some of the problems and the advantages of three programs designed for language arts instruction: "English Volume I" (MECC), "English SAT 1" (Microlab), and "Vocabulary Prompter" (Jagdstaffel). (AEA)
Descriptors: Computer Software, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Grammar
Penrose, John M. – ABCA Bulletin, 1984
Reviews four computer programs that check grammar, punctuation, and spelling; discusses their applicability in the business writing process. (AEA)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Computer Software, Grammar, Punctuation

Giles, Timothy D. – Journal of Developmental Education, 1993
Explains how the search feature available with most word processing programs can reinforce grammar and proofreading skills, helping students focus on grammatical agreement, comma usage, and sentence fragments. Discusses student responses to the technique. (DMM)
Descriptors: Basic Writing, College Students, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software
Oates, Rita Haugh – Quill and Scroll, 1987
Reviews several software packages that analyze text readability, check for spelling and style problems, offer desktop publishing capabilities, teach interviewing skills, and teach grammar using a computer game. (SRT)
Descriptors: Authoring Aids (Programing), Computer Software, Computer Software Reviews, Computer Uses in Education