Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| Biological Sciences | 1 |
| Capstone Experiences | 1 |
| College Science | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Research Projects | 1 |
| Research Reports | 1 |
| Student Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMcQuade, Richard; Kometa, Simon; Brown, Jeremy; Bevitt, Debra; Hall, Judith – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
Research project modules are a key part of UK undergraduate and postgraduate bioscience degree programmes. Report marking invariably uses two assessors, but marking models are mixed with some institutions using two independent markers and others using the project supervisor as one of the assessors. This latter model is controversial with critics…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research Projects, Student Research, Supervisors
