Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Elementary School Students | 3 |
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Oral Reading | 3 |
Reading Fluency | 3 |
Reading Tests | 3 |
Scoring | 3 |
Automation | 2 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Kamata, Akihito | 3 |
Nese, Joseph F. T. | 3 |
Kahn, Josh | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Primary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kamata, Akihito – School Psychology, 2021
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is widely used across the United States as a strong indicator of comprehension and overall reading achievement, but has several limitations including errors in administration and large standard errors of measurement. The purpose of this study is to compare scoring methods and passage…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2020
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) can be used to score oral reading fuency (ORF) assessments to ameliorate current inadequacies (e.g., administration errors, high opportunity cost), and represents an important part of a larger solution to improve traditional ORF. But more research is needed on how ASR performs for diverse student groups. The…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Accuracy, Student Diversity
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores