This report describes the use of Lead Turnaround Partners (LTPs) in the current School Improvement Grant (SIG) program and provides the results of document review, surveys, and interviews with eight State Education Agencies and seven Lead Turnaround Partner organizations. The study focuses on the implementation of the transformation and turnaround models under the SIG program during the 2010-2011 school year. The current marketplace of Lead Turnaround Partner (LTP) providers and the organizational structures of existing LTPs are explored. In addition, the communication strategies and the roles of various players involved in aspects of SIG implementation, including State Education Agencies (SEAs), Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and LTPs are discussed. Lessons learned and recommendations for improvement for each entity are summarized. Document review, surveys, and interviews were gathered/conducted from/with: Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, New York, Tennessee, and Virginia. Document review, surveys, and interviews were gathered/conducted from/with the following LTPs: Academy for Urban School Leadership (AUSL), America's Choice, Cambridge Education, EdisonLearning, Learning Point Associates/AIR, Pearson School Achievement Services, and WestED. Based on the findings, this report offers recommendations for states; districts; the field; states, districts, and LTPs; and the U.S. Department of Education (USED) and states. An appendix provides LTP profiles.