Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Federal Aid | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Grantsmanship | 3 |
Grants | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Research Projects | 2 |
Resource Allocation | 2 |
Educational Quality | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Faculty Evaluation | 1 |
Faculty Promotion | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Goldworthy, Jeffrey | 1 |
Jensen, Krista E. | 1 |
Johnny, Michael | 1 |
Phipps, David | 1 |
Poetz, Anneliese | 1 |
Wood, Fiona Q. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Australia | 2 |
Canada (Toronto) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Phipps, David; Jensen, Krista E.; Johnny, Michael; Poetz, Anneliese – Journal of Research Administration, 2016
Each application to the National Science Foundation (NSF) must contain a Broader Impact (BI) strategy. Similarly, grant applications for most research funders in Canada and the UK require strategies to support the translation of research into impacts on society; however, the guidance provided to researchers is too general to inform the specific…
Descriptors: Grants, Grantsmanship, Foreign Countries, Knowledge Management
Goldworthy, Jeffrey – Australian Universities' Review, 2008
Commonwealth funding formulae have caused Australian universities to become obsessed with maximising external research funding. Considerable pressure is applied to faculties, departments and scholars to apply for funding, and relative success in attracting it is given excessive weight in evaluating research performance. This may be productive in…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Funding Formulas, Researchers

Wood, Fiona Q.; And Others – Higher Education, 1992
A survey investigated the Australian federal research grant process from the perspectives of unsuccessful 1991 applicants (n=222) from four universities. Findings include a number of limitations in the peer review process and information dissemination by the funding agency and raise questions about external evaluator selection. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Federal Aid, Foreign Countries, Grantsmanship, Higher Education