Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| Culture | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Financial Support | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Research | 1 |
| Research Proposals | 1 |
| Resource Allocation | 1 |
| Selection Criteria | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Evaluation | 1 |
Author
| Catherine Davies | 1 |
| Holly Ingram | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom (Leeds) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCatherine Davies; Holly Ingram – Research Evaluation, 2025
As part of the shift towards a more equitable research culture, funders are reconsidering traditional approaches to peer review. In doing so, they seek to minimize bias towards certain research ideas and researcher profiles, to ensure greater inclusion of disadvantaged groups, to improve review quality, to reduce burden, and to enable more…
Descriptors: Resource Allocation, Research, Culture, Probability
