Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Evans, Norman W. | 2 |
| Hartshorn, K. James | 2 |
| Strong-Krause, Diane | 2 |
| Anderson, Neil J. | 1 |
| Merrill, Paul F. | 1 |
| Sudweeks, Richard R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Utah | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEvans, Norman W.; Hartshorn, K. James; Strong-Krause, Diane – System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 2011
Truscott's (1996) indictment on error correction in second-language (L2) writing has ignited much discussion and research on the appropriateness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in L2 contexts. Out of this has emerged a body of research that suggests that WCF can positively impact the linguistic accuracy of student writing. However, these…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Writing Instruction, Undergraduate Students
Hartshorn, K. James; Evans, Norman W.; Merrill, Paul F.; Sudweeks, Richard R.; Strong-Krause, Diane; Anderson, Neil J. – TESOL Quarterly: A Journal for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages and of Standard English as a Second Dialect, 2010
Though recent research has shown that written corrective feedback (WCF) may improve aspects of writing accuracy in some English as a second language (ESL) contexts, many teachers continue to be confused about the practical steps they should utilize to help their students improve their writing. Moreover, some have raised concerns as to whether…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Educational Strategies, Test Results, Writing Evaluation
