Descriptor
Court Doctrine | 2 |
Disabilities | 2 |
Disability Discrimination | 2 |
Discriminatory Legislation | 2 |
Due Process | 2 |
Employment | 2 |
Equal Opportunities (Jobs) | 2 |
Federal Legislation | 2 |
Job Skills | 2 |
Opinions | 2 |
Constitutional Law | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
DePaul Law Review | 2 |
Author
Richman, Daniel A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 2 |
Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Richman, Daniel A. – DePaul Law Review, 1978
In Gurmankin v. Costanzo a U.S. District Court held that a policy of not considering handicapped persons for teaching positions violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it contained an irrebuttable presumption that the handicapped are not competent to teach. The doctrine of irrebuttable presumption is analyzed. (BH)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Doctrine, Disabilities, Disability Discrimination

DePaul Law Review, 1978
Employment rights of the handicapped are examined in this collection of symposium papers. Addressed are: procedural aspects of plaintiff litigation, job relatedness and bona fide occupational qualification doctrines, plaintiff's private right of action, arbitration, insurance, state fair employment legislation, and federal and constitutional…
Descriptors: Court Doctrine, Disabilities, Disability Discrimination, Discriminatory Legislation