NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 46 to 60 of 368 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fairweather, James S. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
This chapter translates the recommendations made in the issue's previous chapters to inform departmental and college personnel decisions, particularly promotion and tenure. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kandiko, C. B.; Blackmore, P. – Journal of Institutional Research, 2008
This study adopted Jarzabkowski's (2005) qualitative, activity-based strategy as practice method to investigate leadership and management of interdisciplinary work. Interviews were conducted with 10 academics in Australia and the United Kingdom. Challenges raised by leaders of academic work can be grouped at various levels according to which…
Descriptors: Interdisciplinary Approach, Interviews, College Faculty, Tenure
Nelson, Jonathan E. – Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 1978
This model is intended as a guideline for facilitating more objective and valid faculty promotion decisions in physical education departments. (MM)
Descriptors: Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Willey, Richard L. – Contemporary Education, 1980
The validity of the "publish or perish" dictum in faculty evaluation and promotion is discussed. Professors cannot always be expected to produce written works if adequate attention is to be paid to the duties of teaching. (CJ)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Workload, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shapiro, Howard N. – Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2006
After two decades of reform, faculty and administrators at research universities have not shifted their attention from teaching to learning. It is also evident that promotion and tenure decisions for faculty are not clear cut. The picture becomes even murkier for faculty with a more even balance between traditional disciplinary research and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Tenure, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Blunt, Peter – Vestes, 1976
A sample of research findings in the business/social science area is reviewed regarding: (1) how much research and publication is being done by academics; (2) the extent to which such activities have an effect on decisions associated with promotion, salary, and selection; and (3) how much importance academics themselves attach to research and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Perry, Shannon E. – Nursing Outlook, 1982
The author argues that nursing faculty need more than a Ph.D. to be considered scholars in the field. A discussion of technical versus professional education in nursing is presented along with an examination of faculty rules for promotion and tenure in schools of nursing. (CT)
Descriptors: Doctoral Degrees, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Nurses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rosenberg, Donald L. – ACA Bulletin, 1989
Reviews attempts of the academic theater community to develop a system to assess creative activity as a legitimate component for promotion and tenure decisions. (MM)
Descriptors: Creative Activities, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Gelmon, Sherril B.; Lederer, Miriam; Seifer, Sarena D.; Wong, Kristine – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The findings of the evaluation of the three-year Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative are presented, describing changes in institutional capacity for community-engaged scholarship, and changes in promotion and tenure policies and processes. The change process in the participating institutions is assessed using the Kotter model of…
Descriptors: Higher Education, College Faculty, Teacher Role, Educational Principles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Campbell, R. Lynn – Interchange, 1986
This paper deals with tenure and promotion in Canadian colleges and universities focusing on the history of judicial/arbitral review of college decision-making, confidentiality versus fairness, and the function of tenure and promotion in postsecondary institutions. (MT)
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Court Role, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaun, David E. – Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1984
Examines the rates of faculty advancement during the formative years of the University of California at Santa Cruz. Found a significant relationship between faculty advancement and quality teaching, in addition to the usual relationship with length of service and publications. (JOW)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education, Nontraditional Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hellweg, Susan A.; Churchman, David A. – Planning for Higher Education, 1981
A model for minimizing or eradicating the weaknesses of the tenure system is offered. The model is designed to be responsive to the needs of higher education, specifically in providing for academic accountability. The system proposed makes decisions about pay, rank, and tenure independent of one another. (MLW)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Geckle, George L. – ADE Bulletin, 1982
Discusses the shortcomings of one college English department and suggests ways the department can be improved. (AEA)
Descriptors: English Departments, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Hanna, Donald E. – New Directions for Continuing Education, 1981
Posits that faculty members avoid participation in continuing education because their involvement is scarcely considered in decisions regarding salary, tenure, and promotion. (JOW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Continuing Education, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Headrick, Charlotte J. – ACA Bulletin, 1991
Discusses the uses and misuses of teacher evaluations. Opposes their use in a statistical way to evaluate promotion and tenure decisions and their awkwardness for the evaluation of theater artists. (SR)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education, Teacher Student Relationship
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  25