NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 31 to 45 of 368 results Save | Export
Bakken, Jeffrey P.; Simpson, Cynthia G. – Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Ltd, 2011
The "Survival Guide for New Faculty Members: Outlining the Keys to Success for Promotion and Tenure" provides new faculty members with practical, down-to-earth wisdom and suggestions for successfully working through to tenure and promotion. The authors--both successful and experienced administrators and experts in higher education--have provided…
Descriptors: Guides, Higher Education, Tenure, College Faculty
Candler, Christopher Scott – ProQuest LLC, 2011
The definition and nature of scholarship is undergoing a transformation across North American medical schools. Some medical schools have adopted broadened views of scholarship that recognize and reward nontraditional scholarly works. This study investigated whether nontraditional scholarly works such as MedEdPORTAL publications contribute to…
Descriptors: Faculty Promotion, Tenure, Medical Schools, Biomedicine
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Borkenau, Peter – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Describing, explaining, and discussing various modern indices of scholarly impact as accomplished by Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, and Mahalchik (this issue) is highly commendable, as such measures get increasingly important in hiring and promotion decisions. The author agrees with almost all points made in the target article, except the…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Correlation, Measurement, Outcome Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cacioppo, John T.; Cacioppo, Stephanie – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Ruscio and colleagues (Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, & Mahalchik, this issue) provide a thoughtful empirical analysis of 22 different measures of individual scholarly impact. The simplest metric is number of publications, which Simonton (1997) found to be a reasonable predictor of career trajectories. Although the assessment of the scholarly…
Descriptors: Measurement, Outcome Measures, Scholarship, Bibliometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Filetti, Jean S. – Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 2009
Universities generally have clear expectations for teaching and scholarship, and often a faculty member's publications, research and scholarship are the primary factors in tenure and promotion decisions. Many universities do include service as one component in annual reviews as well as in assessing progress toward tenure and promotion.…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, College Faculty, Noninstructional Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Porter, Theodore M. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Ruscio et al. (Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, & Mahalchik, this issue) write of a thing with which scientists and scholars are all too familiar, the assessment of published research and of its authors. The author was startled to discover how little the agenda of the paper seems to engage with factors one relies on for salary and promotion…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Data Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hopewell, Thomas M. – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2012
This article presents findings from a case study related to the risks associated with the choice of traditional, tenure track faculty to teach online. Education offered at a distance via the World Wide Web is on the rise; so too is the demand for university faculty members who will teach those courses. While traditional academic and professional…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Risk, Internet, Case Studies
Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia Krzys; Earl-Novell, Sarah – Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2010
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE) has hosted two meetings to explore how peer review relates to scholarly communication and academic values. In preparation for an April 2010 workshop, four working papers were developed and circulated. They…
Descriptors: Tenure, Costs, College Faculty, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rothgeb, John M., Jr.; Burger, Betsy – PS: Political Science and Politics, 2009
This article presents the results from a survey of political science department chairs regarding the tenure procedures and standards at their colleges or universities. The findings reveal that only a small fraction of the colleges and universities in the United States refuse to offer tenure or are attempting to limit tenure. We also find general…
Descriptors: Political Science, Tenure, Department Heads, Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dew, Debra Frank – College Composition and Communication, 2009
This article defines applied rhetorical work as integral to the intellectual work of writing program administration and asks our professional organizations to classify it as such within our position statements. With a specific case, it offers a generative framework for representing and assessing the work's scholarly commons for professional…
Descriptors: Program Administration, Administrator Role, Writing (Composition), Intellectual Disciplines
Howard, Jennifer – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2007
University presses have complained for years that tenure committees unfairly expect their editors to be arbiters of what counts as tenure-worthy work. At the same time, the presses have been caught in a business-side squeeze between dwindling sales (and shrinking subsidies) and the ever-greater pressure on scholars to publish. In this article, the…
Descriptors: Tenure, University Presses, College Faculty, Scholarship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Masse, Michelle A., Ed.; Hogan, Katie J., Ed. – SUNY Press, 2010
All tenured and tenure-track faculty know the trinity of promotion and tenure criteria: research, teaching, and service. While teaching and research are relatively well-defined areas of institutional focus and evaluation, service work is rarely tabulated or analyzed as a key aspect of higher education's political economy. Instead, service, silent…
Descriptors: Tenure, Females, Labor, Rewards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hyon, Sunny – English for Specific Purposes, 2008
Among Swales' (1996) list of occluded academic genres, retention-promotion-tenure (RPT) evaluations have been little studied. These evaluative reports, however, can inform EAP researchers, teachers, and students about ways that writers both follow and transgress discourse conventions to fulfill various purposes through an institutional text.…
Descriptors: Creativity, Tenure, Figurative Language, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Goldworthy, Jeffrey – Australian Universities' Review, 2008
Commonwealth funding formulae have caused Australian universities to become obsessed with maximising external research funding. Considerable pressure is applied to faculties, departments and scholars to apply for funding, and relative success in attracting it is given excessive weight in evaluating research performance. This may be productive in…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Higher Education, Funding Formulas, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huber, Mary Taylor – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2002
This chapter places debates on the place of scholarship of teaching and learning in promotion and tenure decisions in the context of "Scholarship Reconsidered" and "Scholarship Assessed," and reports on cases of faculty who have used the scholarship of teaching and learning to advance their academic careers. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  25