Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 11 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 19 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 50 |
Descriptor
Faculty Evaluation | 368 |
Faculty Promotion | 368 |
Higher Education | 293 |
College Faculty | 276 |
Tenure | 223 |
Personnel Policy | 103 |
Evaluation Criteria | 94 |
Faculty Workload | 74 |
Employment Practices | 70 |
Teacher Salaries | 67 |
Collective Bargaining | 62 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Seldin, Peter | 5 |
Diamond, Robert M. | 3 |
Mooney, Carolyn J. | 3 |
Bavaro, John A. | 2 |
Blackburn, Robert T. | 2 |
Chait, Richard P. | 2 |
Ford, Andrew T. | 2 |
Huber, Mary Taylor | 2 |
Hyon, Sunny | 2 |
Lederman, Douglas | 2 |
Linnell, Robert H. | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 56 |
Postsecondary Education | 41 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 74 |
Administrators | 19 |
Teachers | 17 |
Policymakers | 11 |
Researchers | 3 |
Students | 2 |
Location
Australia | 7 |
Canada | 7 |
United Kingdom | 4 |
United States | 4 |
New York | 3 |
China | 2 |
Malaysia | 2 |
Oregon | 2 |
Colorado | 1 |
Egypt | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Notre Dame Univ., IN. – 1975
Governance, university offerings, faculty information, and general services and facilities are reviewed in the 1975-76 faculty handbook. University governance is described in terms of the bylaws of the board of trustees, executive administration, academic officers, faculty policy and organization, admission standards, registration procedures, and…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Administrative Organization, Administrative Policy, Ancillary Services

Seldin, Peter – Change, 1984
A national survey of liberal arts colleges' institutional policies and practices in evaluating faculty performance and classroom teaching, focusing on the changes in evaluation since 1978, is reported. Factors considered, their frequency of use, and sources of information for evaluation are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria
McManigal, Shirley A. – 1994
This paper describes the faculty evaluation process at the Health Sciences Center at Texas Tech University. It covers the Center's five disciplines: allied health, dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy. Faculty members in these disciplines must usually have certification and/or licensure in the profession as well as typical academic…
Descriptors: Allied Health Occupations Education, Clinical Experience, Dental Schools, Evaluation Methods

Cosser, Michael – South African Journal of Higher Education, 1996
Describes a survey of faculty members at the University of Witwatersrand (South Africa) which investigated the extent of support for use of teaching portfolios, in addition to student evaluations, as a method for evaluating faculty for promotion, and based on responses, development of a profile of portfolio content and procedures for its review.…
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria
Bacchi, Carol – Australian Universities' Review, 1993
It is proposed that, to address the lack of women in senior academic ranks, higher education should reexamine appointment procedures, scrutinize the standards by which men have been assessed traditionally, ask men to justify their own merit, and examine the way in which male academics interact with their female counterparts. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Affirmative Action, Career Ladders, College Faculty
McIntyre, Charles J. – 1977
The University of Illinois' project on the elevation of the importance of teaching consisted of two programs: one to try to better systematize information about teaching effectiveness, and one to develop and validate a peer evaluation questionnaire to secure interpretable information. It is believed that the importance of teaching effectiveness…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Hellenic Coll., Brookline, MA. – 1974
The policies and procedures governing the relationships and responsibilities of administrative and faculty personnel are described in this 1974 edition of the manual. It is organized in four sections covering the governing body, the administration, academic personnel, and non-professional personnel. Duties of specific administrators are outlined,…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Academic Standards, Administrative Policy, Administrator Responsibility
Lightsey, Ralph; And Others – 1975
This 1975 edition of the faculty handbook brings together guidelines and procedures which govern the operation of the college, along with the fundamental rules, regulations, and policies relevant to their positions. The handbook's main sections deal with the school's history and purpose, organization and administration, academic structure, faculty…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Academic Standards, Administrative Policy, Administrator Responsibility
Duke Univ., Durham, NC. – 1972
University administration, faculty composition and organization, professional affairs of the faculty, faculty compensation and benefits, student-faculty affairs, and university libraries, resources and services, and publications are described in the 1972 Duke University handbook. Faculty-related policies and procedures are presented with regard…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrative Policy, Ancillary Services, College Environment

Reiser, Stanley Joel – Academic Medicine, 1995
A new approach to medical school faculty compensation and advancement is proposed as a means for developing a better ethos for teaching. According to the plan, half the available resources are distributed according to departmental merit, based on research and teaching performance of each department faculty as a group. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Budgeting, Compensation (Remuneration), Departments, Educational Economics

Bing, Robert; Dye, Linda – Academe, 1992
The case of a dispute over the college faculty promotion process is examined in the context of a model of the organization of campus governance. The model describes three levels of power relationships with increasing amounts of shared responsibility between faculty and administration. A commitment to partnership is advocated. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Case Studies, College Administration, College Faculty

Mullaney, John Ward; Timberlake, Elizabeth March – Journal of Social Work Education, 1994
Analysis of court cases, employment law, and events in higher education yielded information about tenure as a contract, use of credentials as evidence, and due process in orderly tenure procedures. Academic, legal, and ethical perspectives are considered. Guidelines for social work faculty in dealing with these issues are offered. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Conflict Resolution, Contracts, Court Litigation

Wolfgang, Alan P.; And Others – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1995
A survey of 197 pharmacy school faculty members found the faculty evaluation criteria deemed most important in promotion and tenure decisions included refereed publications, extramural funding, the department head's evaluation, and invited scholarly presentations. Respondents expressed a desire to have more importance placed on other aspects of…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Allied Health Occupations Education, College Faculty, Department Heads
Lunde, Joyce Povlacs; Barrett, Leverne A. – 1994
A study was done to discover whether a program to change the reward structure for teaching at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, a research-oriented university, had had an impact on faculty members' perceptions of the importance of teaching. Questionnaires were administered to 220 faculty in 12 departments in a pre-test and to 166 faculty in 10…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Development
Saint John's Univ., Collegeville, Minn. – 1974
Complete governance and personnel policies for faculty and administrators of St. John's University, Minnesota, are included in the 1974 handbook along with a statement of purpose and historical sketch. Separate chapters contain: (1) responsibilities for all administrative officers, including department and division chairmen; (2) responsibilities…
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Administrative Organization, Administrative Policy, Administrator Responsibility