NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 211 to 225 of 368 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
A procedure for developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation program is described with examples of various components. Procedures for implementing such a program are discussed. Determining and weighting faculty roles, defining roles and gaining information, and arriving at a matrix are described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Moses, Ingrid – Higher Education, 1986
The University of Queensland's use of organizational theory to incorporate student evaluations of instruction into annual faculty evaluations and tenure and promotion decisions as a means of planned institutional change is discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Faculty, College Planning, Employment Practices
Turner, Judith Axler – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1987
Faculty members who write computer software for teaching often find that their chances of getting credit for it during promotion-and-tenure reviews are slim. Software development needs to be considered scholarship just like research. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fries, Marilyn Sibley – Academe, 1986
The trend toward extending nontenured faculty members' probationary periods beyond the traditional 6 years, is discussed, along with problems faced by faculty at the time of nonrenewal, implications for academic careers, and the issue of multiple standards for faculty evaluation within an institution. (MSE)
Descriptors: Career Ladders, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bernard, Huguette; Trahan, Michel – Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 1988
A survey of Canadian university policies concerning faculty evaluation found that institutions using evaluation for administrative purposes, with the student questionnaire the primary instrument. Peer review, written reports, and faculty interviews are also used. Differences between francophone and anglophone institutions and between eastern and…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Collective Bargaining, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sullivan, Teresa A. – Teaching Sociology, 1995
Asserts that an irony of academe is that professional judgments about teachers are made without direct knowledge of their teaching. Describes a four-part peer evaluation process used in a university sociology department. Discusses evaluation purposes, procedures, benefits, and dangers of the process. (CFR)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Department Heads, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bennett, Simon J.; And Others – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1995
A procedure that allows college faculty to obtain rapid student assessment of lecturing performance is described. A computer program facilitates application of the resulting data for self-evaluation, job applications, promotions, and group discussion. The questionnaire's simplicity and ease of processing have been well received by faculty and…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Computer Software, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Redmon, Kent D. – Community College Review, 1999
Reviews the literature on faculty evaluation to define how different purposes and competing values have produced two approaches. A procedural approach relies upon both self-evaluation and appraisals by peers, administrators, and students. The developmental approach rests upon teaching portfolios, dossiers, and self-evaluations. Contains 23…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty College Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lampariello, David A. – Optometric Education, 1998
In 1996-97 the New England College of Optometry revised the faculty promotion and tenure process by recognizing the diverse and unique contributions of all faculty. The redefined process is structured to accommodate ongoing changes within the academic community. The institution's governance structure, guiding principles for tenure and promotion,…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Allied Health Occupations Education, Change Strategies, College Faculty
Grunig, Larissa Schneider – 1987
An informal study examined the disparate treatment in tenure and promotion decisions women journalism educators may receive because of their sex, as well as the adverse impact of such discriminatory patterns and practices on the women themselves, on their departments, and on their students. To gather information related to possible instances of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employer Employee Relationship, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Faculty College Relationship
Blackburn, Robert T. – 1971
This review examines the import of current trends in higher education on faculty. It includes both a general discussion of forces influencing faculty life styles (with implications for administrators) and a critical review of recent research literature, including studies on such topics as supply and demand, mobility, collective bargaining, and…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Mobility
Weinbach, Robert W.; Randolph, Jerry L. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1984
A survey of graduate social work schools in the United States and Canada regarding the use of peer review for tenure and promotion purposes and the specific methods and criteria used is reported, and implications for other areas of professional education are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Huber, Mary Taylor; Cox, Rebecca – Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2004
The authors comment on incentive systems that impede serious scholarly work on teaching and learning. The hallmark of academic freedom is the opportunity it affords faculty members to pursue innovative or unconventional scholarship. Over the past decade or so, teaching initiatives in higher education are gaining visibility, innovation is on the…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Incentives, College Faculty, Scholarship
Mooney, Carolyn J. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1990
Hoping to gain prestige and financial support for research, many four-year institutions have toughened faculty tenure and promotion standards to require more and better research. Some older faculty have been surpassed in salary and perquisites by younger, more aggressive scholars. Morale problems and concern over evaluation criteria have resulted.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Aging in Academia, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berver, Kitty; And Others – Academe, 1992
New Mexico State University addressed the trend toward employing non-tenure-track faculty (NTTs) by capping the proportion of NTTs; acceptance of a two-tiered faculty with differentiated responsibilities; extension of professional rights to NTTs; full and regular NTT evaluation, participation in merit pay, and promotion opportunities; and…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  ...  |  25