NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 196 to 210 of 368 results Save | Export
Seldin, Peter – 1997
This book examines the teaching portfolio approach to evaluating classroom performance of college instructors. It notes that an estimated 1,000 colleges and universities in the United States are now using or experimenting with portfolios, and that this approach, called a "teaching dossier" has been in use in Canada for 20 years. Key…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Blai, Boris, Jr. – 1982
The views of 1,105 faculty members at seven diverse colleges and universities relating to pay-promotion criteria were surveyed. In addition, the parallel-perceptions inquiry enabled comparison of the views of 36 Harcum Junior College faculty and those of 1,069 faculty representing large, medium, and small colleges, both public and private.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Serow, Robert C.; Demery, James – 1999
This paper examines the status and role of teaching faculty at research-intensive universities. After agreeing that research was the dominant element in the university's reward system, a case study format was used to examine the attitudes of 11 active and 18 less-active researchers at a large public research institution regarding their own…
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Faculty, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation
Seldin, Peter – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
Four aspects of faculty self-evaluation are discussed: its relationship to student ratings and teacher characteristics; its use for personnel decisions and improving performance; sample self-evaluation forms and their proper use; and faculty growth contracts. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bergman, Jerry – College Student Journal, 1980
Analyzes the process of making peer evaluations. Factors on which peer evaluation is based are extremely subjective and unconscious. Concludes that until peer rating systems are developed that are reliable and valid, their use should be strictly supplementary, or on an experimental basis. (Author)
Descriptors: Civil Rights Legislation, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Evaluation Criteria
Phillip, Mary-Christine – Black Issues in Higher Education, 1993
Barriers to tenure for women faculty are examined, including different role perceptions for men and women, lack of mentors or professional support, lack of access to prestigious journals for publishing, and male expectations that all faculty will have similar formative experiences and training. (MSE)
Descriptors: Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blake, Virgil L. P.; Tjoumas, Renee – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1990
Discusses research as a criterion for library and information science faculty assessment and reviews the literature pertaining to faculty work patterns, evaluation criteria, assessing the quality of research, and publication productivity. Guidelines for evaluating the quality of research publications are presented, and alternatives to current…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Faculty Publishing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Padovan, Patricia; Whittington, Dale – Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1998
Explores the definition and relevance of faculty scholarship in the community college. Examines positive and negative attitudes toward various scholarship criteria in the faculty-reward (promotion, tenure, salary increase, and release time) systems, and discusses concerns about scholarship as an additional facet of faculty evaluation. (25…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Licata, Christine M.; Morreale, Joseph C. – 1997
This working paper, one in a series about the priorities of the professoriate, explores what is known about campus initiatives with post-tenure review. Part 1 reviews institutional and systemwide policies and outlines operational characteristics, unifying principles, and implementation strategies. The information was gathered from published…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Qualifications, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation
Andes, John – 1988
A guide to faculty evaluation is presented for use as the content for an institutional workshop or for use by individual faculty or administrators for their professional development in the area of evaluation. Purposes of evaluation include: providing a basis to recognize superior performance and to offer faculty development activities, providing…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Court Litigation, Employment Practices, Evaluation Methods
Leonard, W. Patrick – 1983
The use of arbitration to resolve faculty appointment, retention, promotion, and tenure disputes is addressed, based on a review of specific university arbitration decisions. The arbitration literature reveals that faculty employment status decisions are made almost exclusively with reference to academic judgment. Attributes that are frequently…
Descriptors: Arbitration, Collective Bargaining, Contracts, Employment Practices
Whitmore, Jon, Ed. – 1988
Based on a workshop for theatre department chairs, guidance on administrative and departmental responsibilities are provided in the following chapters: (1) "Chairs and Deans: Working Together" (J. Robert Wills); (2) "Faculty Evaluation" (Patti P. Gillespie); (3) "Evaluation for Promotion and Tenure" (James M. Symons); (4) "Production Program…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Budgeting, College Curriculum, College Faculty
Grasha, Tony – 1972
An overview of current approaches and perspectives for assessing faculty performance is presented. The evaluation principles and models are applicable for assessment goals of providing classroom feedback to an instructor, developing promotion, tenure and reappointment procedures, and offering an interface between faculty assessment and career…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Lolley, John L.; Miller, Bob W. – 1978
In an effort to determine if traditional criteria for advancement in rank (i.e., additional university hours above the master's degree) should apply to vocational-technical instructors as well as to academic faculty, a study was conducted at Tarrant County Junior College to survey the use of 21 instructional resources by 138 technical instructors…
Descriptors: Audiovisual Aids, College Faculty, Educational Attainment, Educational Media
BOLIN, JOHN G.; MUIR, JOHN W. – 1966
DEMANDS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION HAVE EMPHASIZED THE NEED FOR OBJECTIVE MERIT RATING OF TEACHERS FOR PROMOTION AND SALARY INCREASES. THE STUDY REVIEWS MERIT-RATING LITERATURE, ANALYZES RATING SCALES AND PROCEDURES, AND MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING MERIT PROGRAMS. THE WRITERS CONCLUDE THAT A COMBINATION OF SUPERORDINATE, PEER,…
Descriptors: Administrators, Behavior Rating Scales, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  ...  |  25