Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Faculty Evaluation | 17 |
Faculty Promotion | 17 |
Higher Education | 17 |
College Faculty | 16 |
Tenure | 12 |
Faculty Development | 10 |
Personnel Policy | 7 |
Employment Practices | 6 |
Collective Bargaining | 5 |
Contracts | 5 |
Fringe Benefits | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Academe | 2 |
Charles C. Thomas, Publisher,… | 1 |
College Teaching | 1 |
Journal on Excellence in… | 1 |
Teaching Sociology | 1 |
Vestes | 1 |
Author
Seldin, Peter | 2 |
Bakken, Jeffrey P. | 1 |
Berver, Kitty | 1 |
Bing, Robert | 1 |
Breton, Cherry C. | 1 |
Diamond, Robert M. | 1 |
Dye, Linda | 1 |
Hansman, Catherine A. | 1 |
Kenney, Stephanie L. | 1 |
Leap, Terry L. | 1 |
Liston, Delores D. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 6 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
Books | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Teachers | 17 |
Practitioners | 16 |
Administrators | 8 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bakken, Jeffrey P.; Simpson, Cynthia G. – Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Ltd, 2011
The "Survival Guide for New Faculty Members: Outlining the Keys to Success for Promotion and Tenure" provides new faculty members with practical, down-to-earth wisdom and suggestions for successfully working through to tenure and promotion. The authors--both successful and experienced administrators and experts in higher education--have provided…
Descriptors: Guides, Higher Education, Tenure, College Faculty
Moses, Ingrid – Vestes, 1985
Results of a survey of attitudes of 100 faculty members at the University of Queensland concerning the institution's system of annual compulsory performance reviews, their benefits and disadvantages, and preferences about the structure and administration of the review system are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion

Liston, Delores D.; Hansman, Catherine A.; Kenney, Stephanie L.; Breton, Cherry C. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1998
After preparing their own teaching portfolios, four Georgia Southern University instructors designed a study to investigate what happens when neither follow-up workshops nor mentoring are provided by the institution. Results indicate that without institutional support, especially mentoring, faculty use teaching portfolios primarily for tenure and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation
Diamond, Robert M. – 1994
This booklet is designed to assist faculty members in serving on promotion and tenure committees. Part 1 focuses on the general process and the role of the Promotion and Tenure Committee. It provides basic principles for Committee members to consider, raises significant issues, and introduces a comprehensive approach to documenting and assessing…
Descriptors: Check Lists, College Faculty, College Instruction, Committees
Seldin, Peter – 1991
This book examines the teaching portfolio approach to evaluating classroom performance of college instructors. It identifies key issues, warnings, and benchmarks for success. It differentiates between portfolios for personnel decisions and portfolios for teaching improvement. It describes how 10 different institutions use portfolios. It lists 30…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Leap, Terry L. – 1993
As more women and people of color hold academic jobs, the incidence of illegal employment discrimination in reappointment, tenure, and promotion decisions also increases. This book addresses how individual faculty members can defend themselves against unfair practices and how universities and colleges can protect themselves from being named in…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Faculty Evaluation
Seldin, Peter – 1997
This book examines the teaching portfolio approach to evaluating classroom performance of college instructors. It notes that an estimated 1,000 colleges and universities in the United States are now using or experimenting with portfolios, and that this approach, called a "teaching dossier" has been in use in Canada for 20 years. Key…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development

Sullivan, Teresa A. – Teaching Sociology, 1995
Asserts that an irony of academe is that professional judgments about teachers are made without direct knowledge of their teaching. Describes a four-part peer evaluation process used in a university sociology department. Discusses evaluation purposes, procedures, benefits, and dangers of the process. (CFR)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Department Heads, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation

Berver, Kitty; And Others – Academe, 1992
New Mexico State University addressed the trend toward employing non-tenure-track faculty (NTTs) by capping the proportion of NTTs; acceptance of a two-tiered faculty with differentiated responsibilities; extension of professional rights to NTTs; full and regular NTT evaluation, participation in merit pay, and promotion opportunities; and…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation

Urbach, Floyd – College Teaching, 1992
A teaching portfolio is to document, over an extended period of time, the full range of one's abilities as a college teacher. Seven dimensions can be documented: what is taught; how it is taught; changes in teaching and course activities; academic rigor; student attitudes; skill development efforts; peer assessment. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Change Strategies, College Faculty, College Instruction

Bing, Robert; Dye, Linda – Academe, 1992
The case of a dispute over the college faculty promotion process is examined in the context of a model of the organization of campus governance. The model describes three levels of power relationships with increasing amounts of shared responsibility between faculty and administration. A commitment to partnership is advocated. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Case Studies, College Administration, College Faculty
American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. – 1994
This study of rewards and recognition in the mathematical sciences in higher education utilized data gathered from site visits to 26 institutions, 3 open forums, and a survey of a sample of faculty and department chairs in mathematical sciences departments. Results found: (1) a substantial gap between what faculty think the reward structure should…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Mathematics, Department Heads, Departments
Pittsburg State Univ., KS. – 1989
The collective bargaining agreement between Pittsburg State University and Pittsburg State University/Kansas National Education Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association, covering the period May 19, 1989 to June 30, 1990 is presented. The contract covers the following items: recognition; equal opportunity; salaries…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Contracts, Employment Practices
Lake Superior State Univ., Sault Sainte Marie, MI. – 1988
The collective bargaining agreement between Lake Superior State University (Michigan) and the Lake Superior State University Faculty Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association, covering the period September 1, 1988 to August 31, 1991 is presented. The agreement covers the following items: definitions; recognition; association…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Contracts
District of Columbia Univ., Washington, DC. – 1988
The collective bargaining agreement between the University of the District of Columbia and the University of the District of Columbia Faculty Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association, for the period October 1, 1988 to September 30, 1993 is presented. The agreement's 33 articles cover the following: purpose and intent, scope…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Confidential Records
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2