Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Experimental Psychology | 3 |
Experiments | 3 |
Games | 3 |
Models | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Behavior | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Definitions | 1 |
Expertise | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Berner, Michael P. | 1 |
Harman, Rachel M. | 1 |
Hoffmann, Joachim | 1 |
Kahan, James P. | 1 |
Kiesel, Andrea | 1 |
Kunde, Wilfried | 1 |
Paine, Julie | 1 |
Pohl, Carsten | 1 |
Rapoport, Amnon | 1 |
Schlottmann, Anne | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schlottmann, Anne; Harman, Rachel M.; Paine, Julie – Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 2012
Under the normative Expected Value (EV) model, multiple outcomes are additive, but in everyday worth judgement intuitive averaging prevails. Young children also use averaging in EV judgements, leading to a disordinal, crossover violation of utility when children average the part worths of simple gambles involving independent events (Schlottmann,…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Models, Children, Age Differences
Kiesel, Andrea; Kunde, Wilfried; Pohl, Carsten; Berner, Michael P.; Hoffmann, Joachim – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009
Expertise in a certain stimulus domain enhances perceptual capabilities. In the present article, the authors investigate whether expertise improves perceptual processing to an extent that allows complex visual stimuli to bias behavior unconsciously. Expert chess players judged whether a target chess configuration entailed a checking configuration.…
Descriptors: Visual Stimuli, Memory, Cognitive Processes, Behavior

Rapoport, Amnon; Kahan, James P. – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976
Four models of coalition formation are tested in a computer-controlled experiment in which three players negotiated to form coalitions in order to gain rewards for themselves. Various measures of the progress of negotiations are introduced, examined, and discussed. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Definitions, Experimental Psychology, Experiments, Games