NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yamaguchi, Motonori; Logan, Gordon D.; Bissett, Patrick G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2012
Although dual-task interference is ubiquitous in a variety of task domains, stop-signal studies suggest that response inhibition is not subject to such interference. Nevertheless, no study has directly examined stop-signal performance in a dual-task setting. In two experiments, stop-signal performance was examined in a psychological refractory…
Descriptors: Evidence, Reaction Time, Inhibition, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Verbruggen, Frederick; Logan, Gordon D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
In the stop-signal paradigm, fast responses are harder to inhibit than slow responses, so subjects must balance speed is the go task with successful stopping in the stop task. In theory, subjects achieve this balance by adjusting response thresholds for the go task, making proactive adjustments in response to instructions that indicate that…
Descriptors: Cues, Models, Second Language Learning, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arrington, Catherine M.; Logan, Gordon D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005
In the voluntary task switching procedure, subjects choose the task to perform on a series of bivalent stimuli, requiring top-down control of task switching. Experiments 1-3 contrasted voluntary task switching and explicit task cuing. Choice behavior showed small, inconsistent effects of external stimulus characteristics, supporting the assumption…
Descriptors: Task Analysis, Experiments, Experimental Psychology, Decision Making