Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Crime | 2 |
Experimental Psychology | 2 |
Experiments | 2 |
Identification | 2 |
Recognition (Psychology) | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Criminals | 1 |
Graduate Students | 1 |
Influences | 1 |
Memory | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Author
Clark, Steven E. | 2 |
Carlson, Curt A. | 1 |
Gronlund, Scott D. | 1 |
Marshall, Tanya E. | 1 |
Rosenthal, Robert | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Oklahoma | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clark, Steven E.; Marshall, Tanya E.; Rosenthal, Robert – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2009
The present research examines how a lineup administrator may influence eyewitness identification decisions through different forms of influence, after providing the witness with standard, unbiased instructions. Participant-witnesses viewed a staged crime and were later shown a target-present or target-absent lineup. The lineup administrators…
Descriptors: Identification, Recognition (Psychology), Administrators, Influences
Carlson, Curt A.; Gronlund, Scott D.; Clark, Steven E. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2008
N. M. Steblay, J. Dysart, S. Fulero, and R. C. L. Lindsay (2001) argued that sequential lineups reduce the likelihood of mistaken eyewitness identification. Experiment 1 replicated the design of R. C. L. Lindsay and G. L. Wells (1985), the first study to show the sequential lineup advantage. However, the innocent suspect was chosen at a lower rate…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Memory, Identification, Crime