NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Stroop Color Word Test1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 141 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulligan, Neil W.; Buchin, Zachary L.; West, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
The testing effect is 1 of several memory effects moderated by experimental design, such that the effect on free recall is larger in a mixed-list than pure-list design (Mulligan, Susser, & Smith, 2016). The current experiments assess hypotheses regarding why this pattern is found. Three extant accounts of design effects (Nguyen & McDaniel,…
Descriptors: Testing, Research Design, Recall (Psychology), Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brainerd, C. J.; Bialer, D. M.; Chang, M.; Upadhyay, P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
In recognition memory, anything that is objectively new is necessarily not-old, and anything that is objectively old is necessarily not-new. Therefore, judging whether a test item is new is logically equivalent to judging whether it is old, and conversely. Nevertheless, a series of 10 experiments showed that old? and new? judgments did not produce…
Descriptors: Memory, Recognition (Psychology), Novelty (Stimulus Dimension), Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McDaniel, Mark A.; Cahill, Michael J.; Bugg, Julie M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
How does orthographic distinctiveness affect recall of structured (categorized) word lists? On one theory, enhanced item-specific information (e.g., more distinct encoding) in concert with robust relational information (e.g., categorical information) optimally supports free recall. This predicts that for categorically structured lists,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Recall (Psychology), Word Lists, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tu, Hsiao-Wei; Diana, Rachel A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
In recognition memory, "recollection" is defined as retrieval of the context associated with an event, whereas "familiarity" is defined as retrieval based on item strength alone. Recent studies have shown that conventional recollection-based tasks, in which context details are manipulated for source memory assessment at test,…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Memory, Recall (Psychology), Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hunt, R. Reed; Smith, Rebekah E.; Toth, Jeffrey P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
The experiments reported here were designed to replicate and extend McCabe, Roediger, and Karpicke's (2011) finding that retrieval in category cued recall involves both controlled and automatic processes. The extension entailed identifying whether distinctive encoding affected 1 or both of these 2 processes. The first experiment successfully…
Descriptors: Cues, Recall (Psychology), Memory, Experimental Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kliegl, Oliver; Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
This study sought to determine whether nonselective retrieval practice after study can reduce memories' susceptibility to intralist interference, as it is observed in the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting. Across 3 experiments, we compared the effects of nonselective retrieval practice and restudy on…
Descriptors: Memory, Interference (Learning), Comparative Analysis, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jacoby, Larry L.; Wahlheim, Christopher N.; Kelley, Colleen M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Three experiments contrasted recollection of change with differentiation as means of avoiding retroactive interference and proactive interference. We manipulated the extent to which participants looked back to notice change between pairs of cues and targets (A-B, A-D) and measured the effects on later cued recall of either the first or second…
Descriptors: Memory, Interference (Learning), Cues, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Osth, Adam F.; Dennis, Simon – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Henson (1996) provided a number of demonstrations of error patterns in serial recall that contradict chaining models. One such error pattern concerned when participants make intrusions from prior lists: Rather than originating from random positions in the prior list, intrusions tend to be recalled in the same position as their position in the…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Serial Ordering, Error Patterns, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Soderstrom, Nicholas C.; Clark, Colin T.; Halamish, Vered; Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
A frequent procedure used to study how individuals monitor their own learning is to collect judgments of learning (JOLs) during acquisition, considered to be important, in part, because such judgments are assumed to guide how individuals allocate their future learning resources. In such research, however, a tacit assumption is frequently made:…
Descriptors: Memory, Experimental Psychology, Metacognition, Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popp, Earl Y.; Serra, Michael J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Recent research suggests that human memory systems evolved to remember animate things better than inanimate things. In the present experiments, we examined whether these effects occur for both free recall and cued recall. In Experiment 1, we directly compared the effect of animacy on free recall and cued recall. Participants studied lists of…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Memory, Recall (Psychology), Cues
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hupbach, Almut; Sahakyan, Lili – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
The attempt to forget some recently encoded information renders this information difficult to recall in a subsequent memory test. "Forget" instructions are only effective when followed by learning of new material. In the present study, we asked whether the new material needs to match the format of the to-be-forgotten information for…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Memory, Visual Stimuli, Word Lists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kornell, Nate – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Attempting to retrieve information from memory enhances subsequent learning even if the retrieval attempt is unsuccessful. Recent evidence suggests that this benefit materializes only if subsequent study occurs immediately after the retrieval attempt. Previous studies have prompted retrieval using a cue (e.g., "whale-???") that has no…
Descriptors: Memory, Feedback (Response), Recall (Psychology), Word Lists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wahlheim, Christopher N.; Maddox, Geoffrey B.; Jacoby, Larry L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Three experiments examined the role of study-phase retrieval (reminding) in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall. Remindings were brought under task control to evaluate their effects. Participants studied 2 lists of word pairs containing 3 item types: single items that appeared once in List 2, within-list repetitions that appeared…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Cues, Recall (Psychology), Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kliegl, Oliver; Pastötter, Bernhard; Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Proactive interference (PI) refers to the finding that memory for recently studied (target) material can be impaired by the prior study of other (nontarget) material. Previous accounts of PI differed in whether they attributed PI to impaired retrieval or impaired encoding. Here, we suggest an integrated encoding-retrieval account, which assigns a…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Experimental Psychology, Memory, Interference (Learning)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Giesen, Carina; Rothermund, Klaus – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Even an irrelevant distractor stimulus is integrated into event files. Subsequently repeating the distractor triggers retrieval of the event file; however, an unresolved issue concerns the question of "what" is retrieved by the distractor. While recent studies predominantly assume that the distractor retrieves the previous response, it…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Interference (Learning), Responses, Priming
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10