Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 32 |
Values | 32 |
Decision Making | 26 |
Models | 10 |
Program Evaluation | 10 |
Evaluators | 7 |
Decision Making Skills | 6 |
Evaluation | 6 |
Higher Education | 6 |
Problem Solving | 5 |
Educational Assessment | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Defining Issues Test | 1 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead; Daniela Schröter; Lyssa Wilson Becho – American Journal of Evaluation, 2024
Evaluation competency frameworks across the globe regard evaluation approaches as important to know and use in practice. Prior classifications have been developed to aid in understanding important differences among varying approaches. Nevertheless, there is an opportunity for a new classification of evaluation approaches, in particular one that is…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Classification, Decision Making, Scholarship
Stack, Kamie K.; Baldinger, Erin E. – North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2022
The process of assessing students is a fundamental part of teaching and learning mathematics. The assessment practices a teacher chooses are shaped by their values while also being shaped by the context of the school, district, state, and country where the teaching takes place. This can result in gaps between teachers' values and practices. In…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes, Mathematics Teachers
Bartholomew, Scott Ronald; Ruesch, Emily Yoshikawa; Hartell, Eva; Strimel, Greg J. – International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2020
Adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ) has proven to be a valid, reliable, and feasible method for assessing student performance in open-ended design scenarios. In addition to the use of ACJ for purely assessment and evaluation, research has demonstrated an opportunity to identify the design values of judges involved with the ACJ process. The…
Descriptors: Design, Evaluators, International Cooperation, Cultural Influences
Gokce, Asiye Toker – European Journal of Educational Research, 2017
This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to enhance ethical evaluation literature. The tool consists of two subscales named "Bases of ethical evaluation," and "Grounds of ethical evaluation." In order to determine the factor structure of the scales, both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were…
Descriptors: Ethics, Questionnaires, Religious Factors, Evaluation Methods
Stewart, Neil; Chater, Nick; Brown, Gordon D. A. – Cognitive Psychology, 2006
We present a theory of decision by sampling (DbS) in which, in contrast with traditional models, there are no underlying psychoeconomic scales. Instead, we assume that an attribute's subjective value is constructed from a series of binary, ordinal comparisons to a sample of attribute values drawn from memory and is its rank within the sample. We…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Sampling, Models, Evaluation Methods
Keyton, Joann; Beck, Stephenson J. – Business Communication Quarterly, 2008
This article proposes a pedagogical framework to help students analyze their group and team interactions. Intersecting five fundamental group attributes (group size, group goal, group member interdependence, group structure, and group identity) with three overarching group processes (leadership, decision making, and conflict management) creates an…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Group Structure, Group Dynamics, Teamwork
Cavalier, Robert; Bridges, Michael – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2007
When a student at Carnegie Mellon University became concerned about perceived grading bias in 2005, he proposed an amendment to the university's student-rights policy. Drawn from David Horowitz's "academic bill of rights," the proposal included assertion of a student's right to have his or her "work evaluated based on the stated…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Student Rights, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods

Borich, Gary D. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
Evaluation models have been taken as methodologies for actually conducting evaluations, instead of as persuasions or frameworks within which more specific constructs and methods must be placed. Although evaluation models do not provide methodologies, they do provide a guide for thinking about how an evaluation could be conducted. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Tilley, Herbert, Ed.
The Student Development Plan consists of a set of learning activity packages for teacher use in secondary school classrooms. It covers the following general areas as they relate to vocational development: (1) self awareness (four activities), (2) value clarification (10 activities), (3) career data and information seeking (four activities), and…
Descriptors: Career Development, Career Planning, Curriculum Guides, Decision Making
Thomas, David A.; Corsi, Jerome R. – 1984
The purpose of this paper is to propose a new, synthetic paradigm for debate analysis and decision making that features the policy systems approach within a context of values as boundaries for decision. As background for the proposed theory, the paper (1) summarizes the notions of paradigm formation and shifts initially presented by T. Kuhn; (2)…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Competition, Debate, Decision Making
Dressel, Paul L. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1982
Practical suggestions to an evaluator are presented. It is seen as essential that an evaluator who would influence decision making through research realize that the research in which he engages, the data collected, and the analysis and interpretation are influenced by the values of the institution that the evaluator serves. (MLW)
Descriptors: Beliefs, Conflict, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Tucker, Susan A. – 1993
Strengths and weaknesses of prevailing evaluation models are analyzed, with attention to the role of feedback in each paradigm. A framework is then presented for analyzing issues faced by evaluators of interactive instructional technologies. The current practice of evaluation relies heavily on 3 models developed over 20 years ago: (1) the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Data Collection, Decision Making, Educational Technology

Stimac, Michele – Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1977
The model presented here is an assessment model. Once individuals have assessed their decision-making process, they have the necessary data as a base on which to plan behavior change. Their next step is to plan a course of action and implement it. (Author)
Descriptors: Decision Making Skills, Evaluation Methods, Individual Development, Individual Power

Mark, Melvin M.; Shatland,d R. Lance – Evaluation Review, 1985
Value judgments are central to the process of stakeholder-based evaluations. The selection of stakeholder participants involves a value judgment about the power and the legitimacy of the stakeholders. Consequences of stakeholder evaluation may include pseudoempowerment. Suggestions for evaluators for improving stakeholder evaluations are made.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluators, Information Needs
Kaltsounis, Theodore – Instructor, 1971
The use of social studies instruction to train children to engage in creative decision making is described. (CK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Child Development, Curriculum, Decision Making