NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shan Zhang; Chris Palaguachi; Marcin Pitera; Chris Davis Jaldi; Noah L. Schroeder; Anthony F. Botelho; Jessica R. Gladstone – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Systematic reviews are a time-consuming yet effective approach to understanding research trends. While researchers have investigated how to speed up the process of screening studies for potential inclusion, few have focused on to what extent we can use algorithms to extract data instead of human coders. In this study, we explore to what extent…
Descriptors: Bibliometrics, Meta Analysis, Research Methodology, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bornmann, Lutz – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, and Mahalchik (this issue) evaluate 22 bibliometric indicators, including conventional measures, like the number of publications, the "h" index, and many "h" index variants. To assess the quality of the indicators, their well-justified criteria encompass conceptual, empirical, and practical…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Citation Analysis, Correlation, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chin, Jeffrey; Dukes, Richard; Gamson, William – Simulation & Gaming, 2009
This article examines the state of assessment in simulation and gaming over the past 40 years. While assessment has come slowly to many disciplines, members of the simulation and gaming community have been assessing the educational effectiveness of their experiential activities for years, in part because of skepticism from more traditional…
Descriptors: Simulation, Evaluation Research, Meta Analysis, Bibliometrics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tian, Jing; Atkinson, Nancy L.; Portnoy, Barry; Gold, Robert S. – Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2007
Introduction: Physicians spend a considerable amount of time in Continuing Medical Education (CME) to maintain their medical licenses. CME evaluation studies vary greatly in evaluation methods, levels of evaluation, and length of follow-up. Standards for CME evaluation are needed to enable comparison among different studies and to detect factors…
Descriptors: Physicians, Medical Education, Health Conditions, Evaluation Methods