Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 10 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 39 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Criteria | 468 |
Faculty Evaluation | 468 |
Higher Education | 326 |
College Faculty | 269 |
Evaluation Methods | 211 |
Teacher Effectiveness | 104 |
Faculty Promotion | 94 |
Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 88 |
Tenure | 86 |
Two Year Colleges | 65 |
College Instruction | 61 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Seldin, Peter | 6 |
Arreola, Raoul A. | 4 |
Centra, John A. | 3 |
Licata, Christine M. | 3 |
Moses, Ingrid | 3 |
Andrews, Hans A. | 2 |
Bayer, Alan E. | 2 |
Braxton, John M. | 2 |
Byrnes, Heidi | 2 |
Connell, Mary Ann | 2 |
Hattie, John | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 43 |
Postsecondary Education | 33 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Location
Australia | 12 |
Canada | 7 |
United Kingdom | 7 |
United States | 5 |
California | 3 |
New York | 3 |
Finland | 2 |
Germany | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Italy | 2 |
Norway | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Jauch, Lawrence R. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Research involving 23 hard science disciplines at a midwestern university indicates that research and teaching are complementary but that time allocation tradeoffs are necessary between the two functions. Administratively, evaluations tend to influence the direction faculty choose to follow. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Braunstein, Daniel N.; Benston, George J. – Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
Evaluations by students for their university courses were compared to rankings made by department chairmen of their faculty. Data show only a moderate agreement between departmental chairmen and students when they are specifically evaluating teaching. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Roskens, Ronald W. – Research in Higher Education, 1983
The Biglan model of classification of academic subject areas is outlined, and its practical implications and uses by administrators for faculty evaluation are discussed. The reasons for applying subject-area standards in faculty productivity studies are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Classification, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Saaty, Thomas L.; Ramanujam, Vasudevan – Research in Higher Education, 1983
A faculty evaluation system that classified performance factors within a hierarchy and weights each, producing a final composite set for each faculty member, is explained and illustrated. The process is recommended for more objective and consistent decision-making about faculty tenure. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Lawler, Peter Augustine – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
In answer to why faculty and administrators rely on quantification of faculty performance (i.e., productivity measures), two reasons are given: (1) it is the only evaluation that is persuasive to a democratic audience (the public); and (2) it is better than none at all. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, College Instruction, Democracy
Orpen, Christopher – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
A study compared tenured and nontenured faculty, based on seniority, discipline area, and previous degree, for productivity in terms of publications. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses yielded similar results: that tenured faculty are no less productive than nontenured. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria

Guerrant, Jennifer M.; Swintosky, Joseph V. – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1981
One institution's expectations of faculty in terms of their professional growth and maturation is discussed. The concept of performance evaluation as a professional development program is reviewed and an annual, individualized faculty evaluation and professional development program currently employed by a college of pharmacy is described.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Parramore, Barbara M. – CEDR Quarterly, 1979
Faculty evaluation guidelines, which have been in effect for five years at North Carolina State University's School of Education, are described. Outcomes of this system are summarized, as well as some of the problems associated with it. (GDC)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Moomaw, W. Edward – New Directions for Higher Education, 1977
A survey and case studies of southern institutions show a great diversity in approaches to instructional evaluation and considerable unevenness in both the effectiveness of the systems in achieving their purposes and in the validity of some of the practices used. (Editor/LBH)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Richlin, Laurie; Manning, Brenda – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Describes seven principles for developing a workable system for evaluation of college teaching, and provides both process and decision matrixes for groups interested in building such a system for their own evaluation. Argues that the system must be safe, explicit, manageable, formative, and satisfy environmental demands for accountability and…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, College Instruction, Decision Making

Hattie, John; And Others – Australian Journal of Education, 1994
It is proposed that, in evaluation of higher education, the individual faculty member is a more appropriate unit of analysis than institution or department. A study of faculty (n=2,048) productivity in publishing scholarly journal articles provides evidence supporting this view. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria

Tagomori, Harry T.; Bishop, Laurence A. – Thought & Action, 1995
A study analyzed the content of 200 instruments used in student evaluation of college classroom teaching performance. Three specific kinds of flaws were examined: ambiguous, unclear, or subjective evaluation items; ambiguous, skewed, or unclear responses to evaluation items; and items that did not characterize classroom teaching performance. (MSE)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Abel, Richard L. – Journal of Legal Education, 1990
A study investigated the actual practices of 84 law schools in evaluating their faculty and compared them to studies by educators and psychologists about the assessment process. Certain dangers are found to be inherent in current evaluation methods, and suggestions for improving instructional evaluation are offered. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Knapper, Christopher; Wright, W. Alan – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Describes the history, goals, and applications of the teaching portfolio as an alternative teaching assessment. (EV)
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Cahn, Steven M. – Academe, 2004
Most college and university administrators claim to care deeply about the quality of teaching at their institutions. But, too often, their actions belie their words. Consider, for example, the following questions. Which candidate for a faculty position is usually viewed as more attractive, the promising researcher or the promising teacher? Who…
Descriptors: Researchers, College Faculty, Personnel Selection, Teacher Salaries