Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 10 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 39 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Criteria | 468 |
Faculty Evaluation | 468 |
Higher Education | 326 |
College Faculty | 269 |
Evaluation Methods | 211 |
Teacher Effectiveness | 104 |
Faculty Promotion | 94 |
Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 88 |
Tenure | 86 |
Two Year Colleges | 65 |
College Instruction | 61 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Seldin, Peter | 6 |
Arreola, Raoul A. | 4 |
Centra, John A. | 3 |
Licata, Christine M. | 3 |
Moses, Ingrid | 3 |
Andrews, Hans A. | 2 |
Bayer, Alan E. | 2 |
Braxton, John M. | 2 |
Byrnes, Heidi | 2 |
Connell, Mary Ann | 2 |
Hattie, John | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 43 |
Postsecondary Education | 33 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Location
Australia | 12 |
Canada | 7 |
United Kingdom | 7 |
United States | 5 |
California | 3 |
New York | 3 |
Finland | 2 |
Germany | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Italy | 2 |
Norway | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Jacobs, Keith W. – Teaching of Psychology, 1989
Suggests a procedure for the evaluation of the department chairperson. Emphasizes the benefits and importance of such evaluations. Claims minimal attention has been given to such evaluations and offers suggestions. Provides a list of 19 evaluation items used. (Author/NL)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Department Heads, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Moses, Ingrid – Journal of Tertiary Educational Administration, 1989
A discussion of the use of performance management for faculty and nonacademic staff in colleges and universities first offers the definition of performance management used in business, examines colleges and universities as institutions of learning, and suggests the notion of quality maintenance as a better approach to personnel management. (MSE)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Administration, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria

Connell, Mary Ann; Savage, Frederick G. – Journal of College and University Law, 2001
Presents an analysis of the arguments for and against consideration of collegiality in higher education employment decisions and a review of the relevant case law. Critics argue that unless collegiality is specified as a separate criterion for evaluation in the faculty contract or handbook, its use is a breach of contract. Others are concerned…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Collegiality, Cooperation, Evaluation Criteria

Dobos, Jean – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Examines traditional criteria for evaluating faculty research. Identifies activities pertinent to the scholarship of discovery, and the assessment practices in the field of communication as well as in general use. (SR)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Barbato, Carole A. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses what scholarship of integration is (interpreting, drawing together, and bringing new insight to bear on original research); what activities constitute such scholarship; examples from the field of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Trent, Judith – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Responds to Ernest Boyer's new definition of scholarship, outlining concepts with which the author agrees, and the author's concerns. Outlines ways in which the Boyer's ideas are potentially counterproductive for the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Rubin, Alan M. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses concerns with Ernest Boyer's redefinitions of what scholarship is. Argues the need for fair and consistent application of assessment standards for scholarship but notes problems of consistency and quality of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation

Shelton, Michael W. – JACA: Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 2000
Contributes to a special issue on how the reconsideration of what scholarship is affects the way in which scholarship is assessed. Discusses the Carnegie Foundation's 1997 report, "Scholarship Assessed." Offers an overview of the text itself, and discusses the centrality of discourse and argument to the work. Discusses implications for…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
King, Margaret L. – Academic Questions, 2003
For too strictly judging job applicants on their academic merits, an outstanding Brooklyn College history professor incurred administrative wrath that--in a vicious campaign of innuendo and slander couched in allegations of "uncollegiality"--almost sank his career. Margaret King chronicles how an alliance of those interested in scholarly…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Teacher Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Tenure
Licata, Christine M. – Innovation Abstracts, 1984
A study was conducted to investigate the current status of post-tenure faculty evaluation in the community college. Questionnaires were mailed to 1,290 tenured and non-tenured faculty and 421 administrators at 9 community colleges. Study findings, based on a 50.1% response rate, included the following: (1) 77% of the respondents indicated that…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Menges, Robert J. – 1984
An optimal evaluation system should have five features if it is to both stimulate academic work and lead to fair decisions: clear expectations, feedback on performance, formative evaluation, summative evaluation, and differential rewards. Women and minorities were asked about their experiences in relation to these features. None had received…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Coe, Robert K.; Weinstock, Irwin – 1983
Questionnaires concerning the importance of publication in professional journals were sent to 193 university economics department heads. There was a 60 percent response rate. Questions were asked about: (1) the necessity of publications for appointment and promotion, (2) how department heads rate the various journals in terms of prestige accrued…
Descriptors: Economics Education, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Hoyt, Donald P.; Stewart, Michael O. – 1976
Officials at a number of higher education institutions have shown that considerable discrepancies exist in faculty salaries, corresponding to sex differences. To date, there has been no satisfactory way to examine the relationship between faculty accomplishments and rewards in the merit system. This study was undertaken to assess the nature of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Arlin, Marshall – Canadian Journal of Education, 1978
Seeks to obtain approximations of the quantity and impact of scholarly journal publication among members of Canada's faculties of education and to tentatively identify some Canadian faculties of education whose members might be particularly productive. Also provides two bases for making comparisons between faculties in terms of scholarly…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload

Eckard, Pamela J. – Peabody Journal of Education, 1980
The steps involved in evaluating college faculty are discussed, including the decision making on the focus, evaluation design, criteria, data collection processes, material review, and committee formation. (JMF)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods