NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 451 to 465 of 1,072 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fant, Helen E.; And Others – Teacher Educator, 1985
A survey was made of 123 colleges and universities in the United States in order to obtain information on criteria and assessment instruments used for student teacher evaluation. Responses were analyzed to determine the extent to which these criteria are based on research. Findings are presented. (MT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Faast, Dorothy A. – Clearing House, 1984
Describes a study that was conducted to determine the effectivenss of training teacher evaluators in lesson plan analysis, classroom observation techniques, and supervisory conference skills. (HOD)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hansen, Richard B.; Rogers, Bruce G. – Educational Research Quarterly, 1984
The convergent and discriminant validity of common measures of three faculty competence attributes (teaching, research, and service) were investigated using multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix analysis. Three different measures for each component were collected on 57 college professors. Results distinguished the three hypothesized components, but…
Descriptors: Competence, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jauch, Lawrence R. – Research in Higher Education, 1976
Research involving 23 hard science disciplines at a midwestern university indicates that research and teaching are complementary but that time allocation tradeoffs are necessary between the two functions. Administratively, evaluations tend to influence the direction faculty choose to follow. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braunstein, Daniel N.; Benston, George J. – Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
Evaluations by students for their university courses were compared to rankings made by department chairmen of their faculty. Data show only a moderate agreement between departmental chairmen and students when they are specifically evaluating teaching. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Howsam, Robert B. – National Elementary Principal, 1973
Argues that, if progress is to be made, educators must develop processes by which they redefine their own professional goals, identify their objectives, proceed toward them, and put into operation an evaluation system that is strongly formative in its effect. (Author/JN)
Descriptors: Accountability, Cultural Differences, Decision Making, Educational Objectives
Deane, Arthur K. – American Vocational Journal, 1973
Descriptors: Accountability, Charts, Evaluation Criteria, Industrial Arts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gromisch, Donald S.; And Others – Journal of Medical Education, 1972
The finding that students and chairmen do not rate faculty members similarly indicates the need to define evaluation criteria better and to devise more precise methods by which to measure them. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, James A.; Radebaugh, Byron F. – Clearing House, 1969
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Secondary School Teachers, Socioeconomic Background, Teacher Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stones, E.; Morris, S. – Educational Research, 1972
Investigation indicates that there are weaknesses in the present system of teaching practice assessment, particularly in the diversity of the methods of assessment. (Authors)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Broudy, H. S. – Journal of Classroom Interaction, 1983
The complexities of defining successful schooling, along with other elusive factors such as teaching styles, pose problems for teacher evaluation. Teaching requires more than the ability to perform skills according to a preset formula; it involves making decisions which combine judgment with performance of skills. (PP)
Descriptors: Competency Based Teacher Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hamby, John V. – Clearing House, 1983
Argues that teacher evaluation is necessary if the performance of teachers is to be improved. Suggests that it can be made more palatable as well as effective if those responsible for it realize that there is value in evaluation. (FL)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dunkleberger, Gary E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Administrators seeking the cooperation of teachers in the classroom observation phase of teacher evaluations should establish well-defined criteria in the areas of planning, technical skills, instructional skills, and classroom management so that teachers can recognize the evaluation process as an objective attempt to encourage their professional…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Lesson Observation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oliver, Bernard – Teacher Educator, 1982
Nine recommended guidelines for teacher performance appraisal are offered as a basis for evaluating an appraisal system. Guidelines, involving a reward system, evaluation training, teacher involvement, classroom improvement, peer observation, alternative-data collection, paperwork, and supervisors, emphasize the positive qualities of teacher…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolf, Harold H. – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1976
Three major issues are discussed in response to the report of the Study Commission on Pharmacy. They are: (1) determination of demonstrable competencies; (2) determination of who is best equipped to provide instruction and serve as role models; and (3) the impact of the report on the training of future pharmaceutical educators and scientists. (LBH)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  ...  |  72