NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 286 to 300 of 468 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Soderberg, L. O. – College Teaching, 1985
The continued nonevaluation of teaching contributes to the dominance of research in the evaluation of faculty members. For both promotion and salary increases, the number of articles published is basically the definition of research. The idea that research is more important than teaching is discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development
Gunn, Bruce – Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 1982
A system of faculty evaluation is described that is based on a hierarchy of assessment stages: foundation (reviewing work goals, standards, and results), peer evaluation, self-assessment, administrator appraisal, and arbitration committee. Checks and balances ensure accuracy of evaluation. (MSE)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, College Faculty, Committees, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cheshire, Nancy; Hagermeyer, Richard H. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1981
Describes the development of a job performance evaluation system at Central Piedmont Community College for faculty, staff, and administrators. States system objectives and benefits. Reviews the two-phase development of performance factors and written performance descriptors and the system's testing and implementation in annual personnel…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
New York University Law Review, 1979
Proposed is a "direct detrimental effect standard" that provides a framework for evaluating substantive grounds for dismissal of tenured faculty. It can be applied for immorality, incompetence, insubordination, financial exigency, and reduction in force. (AVAIL: Fred B. Rothman & Co., 10368 W. Centennial Rd., Littleton, CO 80123, $4.50) (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Competence, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty College Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Millis, Barbara J. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Based on the idea that the skills needed to mentor a college faculty member in development of a reflective teaching portfolio are similar to those a composition teacher uses for student consultation, the process and guiding principles used by one mentor are described. Issues of portfolio organization and sources for objective feedback are also…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Magner, Denise K. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1997
A recent Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching report counters the conventional wisdom in academe that faculty research must be evaluated by standards different from those of teaching and service, maintaining that the different types of faculty work have much in common and must be judged similarly if teaching and service are to gain…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Educational Research, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messmer, Patricia R. – Journal of Professional Nursing, 1989
A national survey of baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs concerning tenure policy and practices provides information about institutional tenure criteria and predictors of tenure award. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fulwiler, Toby – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1988
The complex and comprehensive nature of writing-across-the-curriculum programs makes them difficult to evaluate. There are some measures of program effectiveness that are easy to collect and others that are worth trying for. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Curriculum, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Mooney, Carolyn J. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1991
Pasupati Mukerjee, a pharmacy professor, is crusading for quality, not quantity, in academic scholarship. He points to the lasting impact of work of brilliant scientists with questionable credentials, and proposes more emphasis on a scholar's long-term record of citation by other scholars as a faculty evaluation criterion. (MSE)
Descriptors: Citations (References), College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Park, Shelley M. – Journal of Higher Education, 1996
Current university tenure and promotion criteria are examined critically, and it is suggested that they are both an effect and a source of gender bias. Current working assumptions regarding what constitutes good research, teaching, and service and the relative importance of each reflect and perpetuate masculine values and practices, preventing…
Descriptors: Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Burke, Joseph C. – Studies in Public Higher Education, 1993
This report addresses the issue of "academic productivity," and the critical views of academia held by the public. The section titled "Quality Academics, Quality Productivity," posits that using new notions of productivity, with their emphasis on quality rather than quantity, will allow academia to increase its own…
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Hult, Christine A., Ed. – 1994
Describing the various forms evaluation can take, this book delineates problems in evaluating writing faculty and sets the stage for reconsidering the entire process to produce a fair, equitable, and appropriate system. The book discusses evaluation through real-life examples: evaluation of writing faculty by literature faculty, student…
Descriptors: Adjunct Faculty, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Gurney, David W. – 1977
Opinions and research findings differ on two fundamental aspects about a teacher's impact in the classroom: the amount students learn, and the process of instruction. Although consensus is lacking, faculty evaluations are widely used by administrators in such matters as promotions, tenure, and merit increases. Studies of college students'…
Descriptors: College Students, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Slicker, Russ; And Others – 1988
A description is provided of the development and implementation of a Faculty Coaching System, a systematic evaluation process, at Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC). Introductory comments by Russ Slicker offer a brief history and description of MATC and a profile of MATC's well-established, stable faculty. Next, Beverly Simone discusses the…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Community Colleges, Department Heads
Duckett, Willard R., Ed. – 1983
These three conference presentations on teacher evaluation cover gathering and using evaluation information. Robert D. Brown emphasizes the communication and trust necessary to maintaining a good working relationship during and after evaluations. Basic strategies of data gathering and reporting are covered, as well. Using a management information…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  ...  |  32