NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)2
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 37 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gagliardi, R.; Mauri, M.; Polzonetti, A. – Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2016
This presentation illustrates the framework of processing performance of the faculty of the University of Camerino. The evaluation criteria are explained and the technological structure that allows automatic performance assessment available online anywhere and anytime. The designed framework is usually applied to the performance evaluation of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Alhassan, Awad; Ali, Holi Ibrahim Holi – Arab World English Journal, 2019
Higher education institutions (HEIs), across the globe, have been increasingly applying staff performance appraisals (PA) to ensure good quality educational outcomes, and to meet the requirements of national and international quality assurance and academic accreditation organizations. Staff at the forefront of PA since they are affected either…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Faculty Evaluation, Personnel Evaluation, Models
Harley, Diane; Acord, Sophia Krzys; Earl-Novell, Sarah – Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2010
As part of its Andrew W. Mellon Foundation-funded Future of Scholarly Communication Project, the Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE) has hosted two meetings to explore how peer review relates to scholarly communication and academic values. In preparation for an April 2010 workshop, four working papers were developed and circulated. They…
Descriptors: Tenure, Costs, College Faculty, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bridges, Edwin M. – Administrator's Notebook, 1974
Examines the potential of typical evaluation processes to enhance instructional performance. Finds them ill-suited to this purpose. Advocates a disclosure-free approach to evaluation. (Author)
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Quality, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Needham, Douglas – Journal of Economic Education, 1982
Describes a theoretical model for evaluating college faculty that can improve faculty performance and resource allocation. Characteristics of the model, appropriate evaluation criteria for teaching, research, administrative, and other activities, and departmental procedures for determining evaluation criteria and weights are discussed. (AM)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Economics Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Jordan, Catherine M.; Wong, Kristine A.; Jungnickel, Paul W.; Joosten, Yvonne A.; Leugers, Rebecca C.; Shields, Sharon L. – Metropolitan Universities, 2009
The Peer Review Workgroup of the Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative developed a novel set of quality community-engaged scholarship characteristics and a resource package aimed at two primary audiences: faculty seeking promotion or tenure based on community-engaged scholarship; and review, promotion, and tenure committee members…
Descriptors: Tenure, Faculty Development, College Faculty, Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Camp, Robert C.; And Others – Journal of Higher Education, 1988
Awarding merit pay is a two-step process involving a performance review and a monetary calculation. A model that will distribute a finite amount of money while taking into account performance levels and base salaries of evaluees is described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Arreola, Raoul A. – 1995
This handbook provides a practical model for developing and using a comprehensive faculty evaluating system that responds to the specific needs, concerns, and characteristics of the faculty and administration of an individual academic unit. It outlines an eight-step procedure that focuses on the determination of: (1) the faculty role model; (2)…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – College Student Journal, 1973
Determines that the factor structure of the instructional model measured by the Michigan State University Student Instructional Rating System (SIRS) form could be replicated by an adapted version of the SIRS instrument at Florida State University. (Author)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smith, Al – New Directions for Community Colleges, 1983
Provides a historic perspective for staff evaluation and descriptions of conceptual frameworks used in evaluation program planning. Recommends the Southern Regional Education Board's framework for faculty evaluation that includes the development of evaluation purposes; areas for examination; essential evaluation criteria, standards, and evidence;…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Miller, Rosalind; Jenkins, Elizabeth – 1978
This report illustrates the steps in the development of an evaluative model for non-teaching faculty, using the school media specialist as an example. The model measures how the professional applies knowledge of a given content area to improve learning in a particular school situation, and consists of three parts: (1) documentation developed by…
Descriptors: Competence, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ketefian, Shake – Nursing Outlook, 1977
The author describes a paradigm, presented in the form of a matrix, designed to evaluate all relevant dimensions of a faculty member's (college or university) role on an ongoing basis. Each of the paradigm's elements, which illustrate data for evaluating faculty performance, is also discussed. (SH)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pollitt, Christopher – Higher Education Review, 1988
A discussion of university faculty evaluation, a relatively new phenomenon in the United Kingdom, examines three models of assessment geared to personnel management, professional development, and consumer protection, and practical issues in their application. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Consumer Protection, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
California Junior Coll. Association, Sacramento. – 1972
This report presents the proceedings of the Conference on Models for the Evaluation of Teaching. The papers included are: (1) Teachers and Their Evaluation; (2) A Performance-Centered Model for the Evaluation of Teaching; (3) A Learner-Centered Model; (4) Evaluation as a Change Mechanism--A Management Model; (5) Faculty Roles in Evaluation; (6)…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grinnell, Richard M., Jr.; Kyte, Nancy S. – Journal of Education for Social Work, 1976
Results are presented of a nationwide study that examined the written criteria currently used by graduate schools of social work for the appointment, retention, and promotion of their faculties. A content analysis of the study is discussed, and a unique behavioral model for the evaluation of faculty competence is offered. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Competence, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3