NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hopkins, Paul – NASSP Bulletin, 2016
The purpose of this study was to determine how K-12 public school teachers perceive the use of student performance data in teacher evaluations. The proprietary, utility, feasibility, and accuracy standards created by the Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation served as a framework for the study. An online survey was deployed to a…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Faculty Development, Public School Teachers, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Khachatryan, Edit – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Teachers crave yet rarely receive qualitative performance feedback. Though student feedback has been studied, we know little about what kinds of feedback are useful to teachers for improving practice. This study begins to address the need in research on the nature of feedback teachers receive from classroom observations as well as on how teachers…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Observation, Teaching Methods, Administrator Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Staff evaluation is a high-interest area for all members of the school community. Since there is no definitive research that lights the way to a "perfect" evaluation system, the development of a plan falls upon the local school administrator's shoulders. Guidelines and a checklist may provide some assistance in this endeavor. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Evaluation Criteria, Program Proposals, School Districts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McIntire, Ronald G.; McIntire, Jeanne D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Suggests ways for ensuring that teacher evaluation methods used by principals when dismissing teachers will stand up to the challenges posed by hearings: Did the principal try to help the teacher improve? Were evaluation criteria relevant? Was the decision to terminate arbitrary or capricious? Was the evaluation process confidential? (PGD)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Administrator Role, Evaluation Criteria, Hearings
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Isenberg, Alice P. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
Evaluators should help teachers promote professional excellence, improve student learning, and realize classroom consistency. Consistent evaluators possess certain skills, including gathering factual data, observing objectively, gauging teachers' effectiveness at reinforcing lesson plans, establishing ameliorative guidelines through clinical…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Observation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Valentine, Jerry – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
Describes a process of supervision that the author used successfully when he was a principal. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Evaluation Criteria, Secondary Education, Teacher Administrator Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marcotte, Donald G. – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
Administrators seeking effective teacher evaluation should be cautious about using extensive evaluative formats without first examining whether they encourage two-way communication between the administrator and the teacher. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Evaluation Criteria, Secondary Education, Teacher Administrator Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pembroke, Eileen; Goedert, Edmund R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Effective teacher performance evaluation systems are fair, objective, job-specific, reliable, clear, provide for teacher development, and are oriented toward both the teacher's processes and the teacher's products. Loyola Academy involved teachers in developing an evaluation system exhibiting these features as well as a performance compensation…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines, Incentives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goens, George A.; Lange, Ronald W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
The process of personnel analysis is one of the few viable vehicles in the educational environment that can lead to the improvement of instruction and professional growth, the authors contend. Such analysis must, however, be implemented in a non-threatening manner. (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Improvement, Role Perception, Supervisory Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conley, David T. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Performance standards help define more clearly the behaviors necessary for evaluated persons to perform their jobs successfully. This article discusses how performance standards differ from criteria; outlines formats; and presents a behaviorally anchored rating scale. (MLH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Job Performance, Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conway, James – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
Coaching occurs in many fields, including music, drama, and various sports activities. Building a "coaching" metaphor might help clarify differences in coaching roles that principals and teachers find confusing. Most head coaches recognize that responsible evaluation is more helpful than absolute power in helping each player be the best…
Descriptors: Department Heads, Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Leadership, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pine, Gerald J.; Boy, Angelo V. – NASSP Bulletin, 1975
These authors see teacher evaluation as a cooperative process, one that evaluates competency from both internal and external frames of reference. Meeting initial resistance, determining who evaluates, and outlining necessary conditions are all part of this article. (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Student Development, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hansen, J. Merrell – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
Teacher evaluation should be implemented as a meaningful way to continue improvement of instructional practice. Evaluation criteria must be carefully defined and measured to eliminate ambiguity. (Author)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Manatt, Richard P.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Presents a 30 item teacher evaluation instrument along with a discussion of its application. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Improvement, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Robinson, John J.; Lee, John H., Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
A survey of Connecticut high school teachers, principals, and other supervisors about the concepts considered important in observing a class. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Administrators, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Principals
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2