Descriptor
College Faculty | 4 |
Evaluation Criteria | 4 |
Faculty Evaluation | 4 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Faculty College Relationship | 2 |
Tenure | 2 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Check Lists | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Course Evaluation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Change | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Ross, Aden – Change, 1987
People on the tenure track complain that evaluation criteria are inexplicit. The second problem is the allocation of energies between teaching and publication. Administrators must be informed about anything that explains exactly what the faculty member's work means. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Evaluation

Seldin, Peter – Change, 1984
A national survey of liberal arts colleges' institutional policies and practices in evaluating faculty performance and classroom teaching, focusing on the changes in evaluation since 1978, is reported. Factors considered, their frequency of use, and sources of information for evaluation are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria

Partin, Ronald L. – Change, 1984
A system of evaluating faculty performance in research and scholarly activity, service, and teaching by awarding points for specific activities is outlined. The point system is used to distribute merit monies allotted by the university. Advantages of the system include predictability, specificity, and flexibility for faculty to develop individual…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Check Lists, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria

Williams, Wendy M.; Ceci, Stephen J. – Change, 1997
A study compared student ratings (n=472) of course and professor before and after a faculty development workshop in lecture presentation; all other aspects of the course were kept the same, including content. Results suggest student ratings changes were affected substantially by stylistic changes in instruction, not by what students learned.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Course Evaluation, Educational Trends