NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goulding, James – Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2021
Background: This paper outlines the findings of a sociocultural study that examined how digital contexts shape historical thinking. It was assumed that the tools used to engage with historical information mediate thinking, and that when evaluating historical information online, participants would draw upon heuristics associated with Historical…
Descriptors: College Students, History Instruction, History, Web Sites
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Palisse, Jennifer; King, Deborah Martina; MacLean, Mark – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2022
There is a growing interest in using comparative judgement as a peer assessment tool involving students choosing the 'better' of two pieces of work. However, it has not been shown whether peer assessment through comparative judgement is effective for students' learning. To gain a better understanding of the comparative judgement process, we…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Evaluation Criteria, Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carroll, Danny – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
This quantitative study examines student self-assessment accuracy in supported, criteria-based self-assessment in two business discipline courses. Initial and subsequent student-instructor marking agreement were analysed in two consecutive assessable tasks. Initial over-assessment was widespread and student's under-assessing was associated with…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Student Evaluation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephens, Rachel G.; Dunn, John C.; Hayes, Brett K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
When asked to determine whether a syllogistic argument is deductively valid, people are influenced by their prior beliefs about the believability of the conclusion. Recently, two competing explanations for this belief bias effect have been proposed, each based on signal detection theory (SDT). Under a response bias explanation, people set more…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Bias, Logical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yucel, Robyn; Bird, Fiona L.; Young, Jodie; Blanksby, Tania – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014
Lack of clarity about assessment criteria and standards is a source of anxiety for many first-year university students. The Developing Understanding of Assessment for Learning (DUAL) programme was designed as a staged approach to gradually familiarise students with expectations, and to provide opportunities for the development of the skills…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Peer Evaluation, College Freshmen, Research Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wyatt-Smith, Claire; Klenowski, Val – Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2013
This paper engages with debates about whether comprehensive prior specification of criteria and standards is sufficient for informed professional judgement. A preoccupation has emerged with the specificity and explication of criteria intended to regulate judgement. This has resulted in criteria compliance in the use of defined standards to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Standards, Evaluative Thinking, Elementary School Teachers
Russell, N.; And Others – 1981
This document provides units to assist teachers and parents in evaluating kindergarten and preschool curricula. Preparing an evaluation and planning an evaluation are covered in units I and II. Two other units have been written as resource documents and present data-gathering methods and ways of reporting and using information. The authors stress…
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking
Watt, Michael G. – 1990
This article reports a study of decision-making processes for selecting instructional materials. The project had two aims: (1) to survey research findings and practices of decision-making processes in instructional material selection in the United States and Australia; and (2) to identify the attributes of decision-making processes used to select…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Decision Making Skills, Evaluation Criteria