Descriptor
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Educational Quality | 2 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Faculty Evaluation | 2 |
| Faculty Publishing | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Productivity | 2 |
| Citation Analysis | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Faculty Workload | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Hattie, John | 2 |
| Print, Murray | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHattie, John; And Others – Australian Journal of Education, 1994
It is proposed that, in evaluation of higher education, the individual faculty member is a more appropriate unit of analysis than institution or department. A study of faculty (n=2,048) productivity in publishing scholarly journal articles provides evidence supporting this view. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Citation Analysis, College Faculty, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedPrint, Murray; Hattie, John – Higher Education, 1997
A study tested a procedure to identify and weigh various indicators of college faculty research productivity, as one measure of program quality. Eighty-six faculty in 34 Australian schools of education were surveyed. Highly valued indicators of research productivity included refereed journal articles, peer reviewed books, and major competitive…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Competition, Educational Quality, Evaluation Criteria
