Descriptor
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Administration | 1 |
| Confidentiality | 1 |
| Counselor Client Relationship | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Fraud | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Lawyers | 1 |
| Legal Problems | 1 |
| Research Administration | 1 |
| School Personnel | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of College and… | 1 |
Author
| Drinan, Robert F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDrinan, Robert F. – Journal of College and University Law, 1993
It is proposed that the attorney-client privilege of confidentiality may be more important in the case of the university attorney than in the situation of the attorney representing the client as a law firm member. The principle is illustrated in a hypothetical case concerning research fraud. (MSE)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Administration, Confidentiality, Counselor Client Relationship
