Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
| Ethics | 2 |
| Integrity | 2 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Critical Thinking | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evidence Based Practice | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Jasper Roe | 2 |
| Mike Perkins | 2 |
| Darius Postma | 1 |
| Don Hickerson | 1 |
| James McGaughran | 1 |
| Jason MacVaugh | 1 |
| Leon Furze | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Vietnam | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Darius Postma; James McGaughran; Don Hickerson – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
This study explores the capability of academic staff assisted by the Turnitin Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tool to identify the use of AI-generated content in university assessments. 22 different experimental submissions were produced using Open AI's ChatGPT tool, with prompting techniques used to reduce the likelihood of AI detectors…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Identification, Natural Language Processing
Leon Furze; Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Jason MacVaugh – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies in higher education has raised concerns about academic integrity, assessment practices and student learning. Banning or blocking GenAI tools has proven ineffective, and punitive approaches ignore the potential benefits of these technologies. As a result, assessment…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Higher Education, Evaluation Methods
