Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Employment Practices | 153 |
Faculty Evaluation | 153 |
College Faculty | 139 |
Higher Education | 137 |
Personnel Policy | 129 |
Tenure | 100 |
Teacher Salaries | 93 |
Contracts | 92 |
Collective Bargaining | 88 |
Grievance Procedures | 85 |
Leaves of Absence | 77 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Chait, Richard P. | 3 |
Ford, Andrew T. | 3 |
Licata, Christine M. | 2 |
Seldin, Peter | 2 |
Abrami, Philip C. | 1 |
Anderson, Erin, Ed. | 1 |
Andes, John | 1 |
Andrews, Hans A. | 1 |
Bagshaw, Marque | 1 |
Banachowski, Grace | 1 |
Berver, Kitty | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 79 |
Teachers | 22 |
Administrators | 20 |
Policymakers | 16 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 1 |
Equal Pay Act 1963 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Smith, Joshua L. – 1987
A brief history is provided of the efforts undertaken in California to devise alternatives to the current rules concerning credentials, tenures, and evaluation for faculty and administrators, along with a comparison of the recommendations emanating from two legislatively mandated studies of these issues. First, historical background is presented…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrators, College Faculty, Community Colleges
Licata, Christine M. – 1987
Factors that have led to post-tenure evaluation of faculty are considered, along with concerns that should be examined before designing a post-tenure review process. Post-tenure evaluation is not in opposition to the principle of tenure and to policy statements about tenure issued by the American Association of University Professors, provided that…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Decision Making, Employment Practices
Licata, Christine M. – 1986
Factors that have led to post-tenure evaluation of faculty are considered, along with limitations of tenure in general and current post-tenure evaluation practices. Positions of advocacy and opposition to post-tenure evaluation are identified, along with practical considerations that institutions might consider before modifying or implementing a…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Decision Making, Employment Practices
Lee, Barbara A. – 1987
The issue of qualifications for tenure is examined with attention to judicial tests for qualification in lawsuits in which faculty alleged that negative tenure decisions were infected with illegal discrimination. The focus is the degree to which a faculty plaintiff must demonstrate at the first stage of the lawsuit that he or she was qualified for…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Decision Making, Definitions

Gillmore, Gerald M. – Journal of College and University Law, 1984
The efficacy of student ratings is examined through existing research, and it is concluded that although the ratings are generally reliable and valid indicators of teaching effectiveness and are not strongly influenced by extraneous factors, additional independent evaluation means are needed. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation
Anderson, Erin, Ed. – 1993
Twenty-five profiles of college and university programs using teaching portfolios to evaluate faculty are presented to illustrate how portfolio use relates to institutional context and purposes of evaluation. An introductory section makes observations about the profiles in general and highlights some issues emerging during preparation of the…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria
American Council on Education, Washington, DC. – 1983
Guidelines for colleges concerning the privacy of employee records are presented in two policy statements. Institutional policy should minimize intrusiveness, maximize fairness, and create legitimate expectations of confidentiality. In addition to strengthening professional equity of treatment, confidentiality permits consideration of both adverse…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Administration, College Faculty, Confidential Records
Hines, N. William – 1985
The addition of a clinical component to formal legal education is discussed, along with a proposal to upgrade the status of clinical faculty. Attention is directed to the history of efforts by the practicing bar to influence the scope and methods of legal education, the controversy over a proposed equality-of-treatment standard, and the future of…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Clinical Experience, College Faculty
Magner, Denise K. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1997
A recent Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching report counters the conventional wisdom in academe that faculty research must be evaluated by standards different from those of teaching and service, maintaining that the different types of faculty work have much in common and must be judged similarly if teaching and service are to gain…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Educational Research, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria

Newman, Kathy – Academe, 1999
A junior faculty member reflects on the dilemma of that professional position, noting that its anxieties fall into two categories: "Is this all there is?" and "What if we lose it?" She examines problems with, and prohibitions against, speaking one's mind in that position, sees solutions as being institutional or individual, and examines how…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload

Newport, John F. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1996
In the United States, college students' ratings of instructors are routinely used to make personnel decisions. However, closer examination of the qualifications of amateur student raters and novice public school teachers who have received training that should enable them to be good raters suggests that neither group is qualified to give reliable…
Descriptors: College Students, Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Park, Shelley M. – Journal of Higher Education, 1996
Current university tenure and promotion criteria are examined critically, and it is suggested that they are both an effect and a source of gender bias. Current working assumptions regarding what constitutes good research, teaching, and service and the relative importance of each reflect and perpetuate masculine values and practices, preventing…
Descriptors: Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Shreeve, William; And Others – 1984
The philosophy, operations, and applications of the Eastern Washington University Department of Education Merit Pay System are described. The system is designed to: eliminate arbitrary assessments, reward desired behaviors, award merit pay to those achieving designated goals, individualize rewards, encourage cooperation, and simplify evaluative…
Descriptors: Compensation (Remuneration), Employment Practices, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Blai, Boris, Jr. – 1982
The views of 1,105 faculty members at seven diverse colleges and universities relating to pay-promotion criteria were surveyed. In addition, the parallel-perceptions inquiry enabled comparison of the views of 36 Harcum Junior College faculty and those of 1,069 faculty representing large, medium, and small colleges, both public and private.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Chait, Richard P.; Ford, Andrew T. – Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, 1977
Issues concerning tenure of college faculty and the application of tenure policies on campuses are considered. Tenure decisions typically reflect evaluations of performance and judgments about potential. Minimum eligibility requirements commonly used and typical reasons for revoking an individual's tenure status are outlined. As defined by the…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Administrative Policy, Administrator Responsibility, College Faculty