Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
| Technical Assistance Center… | 2 |
| Behavioral Disorders | 1 |
| Journal of Positive Behavior… | 1 |
| Remedial and Special Education | 1 |
| School Psychology Review | 1 |
Author
| McIntosh, Kent | 8 |
| Hoselton, Robert | 4 |
| Ghemraoui, Adam | 3 |
| Nese, Rhonda N. T. | 3 |
| Bloom, Jerry | 2 |
| Mercer, Sterett H. | 2 |
| Nese, Joseph F. T. | 2 |
| Phillips, Danielle | 2 |
| Claassen, Jennette | 1 |
| Cook, Clayton R. | 1 |
| Duong, Mylien T. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 8 |
| Journal Articles | 5 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 7 |
| High Schools | 4 |
| Junior High Schools | 4 |
| Middle Schools | 4 |
| Secondary Education | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkKhoury, Caitlin Rasplica; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Robert – Remedial and Special Education, 2019
Fidelity of implementation of school practices is crucial to student outcomes. Several types of tools, including self-assessments, are available for measuring fidelity, but little is known regarding the relation of self-assessments of fidelity to fidelity instruments completed with the support of external experts, specifically, during the first…
Descriptors: Validity, Fidelity, Program Implementation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Nese, Rhonda N. T.; Nese, Joseph F. T.; McIntosh, Kent; Mercer, Sterett H.; Kittelman, Angus – Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2019
In this study, longitudinal data from 708 schools across five states in the continental United States were analyzed to measure the time between initial training and adequate implementation of Tier I Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports over 5 years and the extent to which it varied by school characteristics. Results indicated…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Institutional Characteristics, Suburban Schools
Nese, Rhonda N. T.; McIntosh, Kent; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Ghemraoui, Adam; Bloom, Jerry; Johnson, Nanci W.; Phillips, Danielle; Richter, Mary F.; Hoselton, Robert – Grantee Submission, 2016
This study examines predictors of abandonment of evidence-based practices through descriptive analyses of extant state-level training data, fidelity of implementation data, and nationally reported school demographic data across 915 schools in 3 states implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). Schools…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Predictor Variables, Program Termination
Nese, Rhonda; McIntosh, Kent; Nese, Joseph; Hoselton, Robert; Bloom, Jerry; Johnson, Nanci; Richter, Mary; Phillips, Danielle; Ghemraoui, Adam – Behavioral Disorders, 2016
This study examines predictors of abandonment of evidence-based practices through descriptive analyses of extant state-level training data, fidelity of implementation data, and nationally reported school demographic data across 915 schools in three states implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). Schools…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Predictor Variables, Program Implementation, Fidelity
Cook, Clayton R.; Duong, Mylien T.; McIntosh, Kent; Fiat, Aria E.; Larson, Madeline; Pullmann, Michael D.; McGinnis, Jenna – School Psychology Review, 2018
Longstanding discipline disparities for Black male students are associated with untoward outcomes and necessitate feasible and effective school-based solutions. This study examined the efficacy of GREET-STOP-PROMPT (GSP) as a low-cost, potentially high-yield strategy designed to intervene on putative malleable root causes proximal to…
Descriptors: Males, African American Students, Student Behavior, Discipline Problems
Kim, Jerin; McIntosh, Kent; Hoselton, Rob – Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2014
To illustrate the three-tiered model, Tier I (universal) supports are delivered similarly to all students in all settings, and at least 80% of students are expected to respond to these supports. Beyond universal supports, Tier II (targeted) supports serve 10-15% of students whose behavior does not respond to Tier I supports. A small group of…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Program Implementation, Student Behavior, Behavior Problems
McIntosh, Kent; Mercer, Sterett H.; Nese, Rhonda N. T.; Ghemraoui, Adam – Grantee Submission, 2016
The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which distinct patterns of fidelity of implementation emerged for 5,331 schools over a five-year course of implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). We used latent class analysis to classify schools based on their likelihood of implementing SWPBIS with…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Multivariate Analysis, Program Implementation
Meng, Paul M.; McIntosh, Kent; Claassen, Jennette; Hoselton, Robert – Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2016
School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) is an example of a framework for implementing school-based practices with fidelity and durability. Critical features of SWPBIS include: (a) teaming; (b) data-based decision making; and (c) using systems for supporting staff in implementation. These features of SWPBIS allow…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Intervention, Program Implementation, Teamwork
