Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Lindsay, Jim | 2 |
Carroll, Megan | 1 |
Cho, Eunsoo | 1 |
Citkowicz, Martyna | 1 |
Kidron, Yael | 1 |
Miller, David I. | 1 |
Roberts, Garrett J. | 1 |
Roberts, Greg | 1 |
Scammacca, Nancy K. | 1 |
Vaughn, Sharon R. | 1 |
Walters, Kirk | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 2 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Preschool Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Williams, Ryan; Citkowicz, Martyna; Miller, David I.; Lindsay, Jim; Walters, Kirk – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2022
Since the standards-based education movement began in the early 1990s, mathematics education reformers have developed and evaluated many interventions to support students in mastering more rigorous content. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of U.S. PreK-12 mathematics intervention effects from 1991 to 2017 to study sources of…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Mathematics Education, Educational Change, Difficulty Level
Scammacca, Nancy K.; Roberts, Garrett J.; Cho, Eunsoo; Williams, Kelly J.; Roberts, Greg; Vaughn, Sharon R.; Carroll, Megan – Review of Educational Research, 2016
The history of research on interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4 through 12 dates back to 19th-century case studies of seemingly intelligent children who were unable to learn to read. Physicians, psychologists, educators, and others were determined to help them. In the process, they launched a century of research on a wide variety of…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Reading Programs, Intervention, Annual Reports
Kidron, Yael; Lindsay, Jim – Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia, 2014
REL Appalachia conducted a systematic review of the research evidence on the effects of increased learning time. After screening more than 7,000 studies, REL Appalachia identified 30 that met the most rigorous standards for research. A review of those 30 studies found that increased learning time does not always produce positive results. However,…
Descriptors: Time Factors (Learning), Time on Task, Meta Analysis, Academic Standards