Descriptor
| Discipline Policy | 162 |
| Due Process | 162 |
| Student Rights | 162 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 91 |
| Court Litigation | 88 |
| School Law | 75 |
| Suspension | 53 |
| Student School Relationship | 39 |
| Expulsion | 35 |
| Discipline | 32 |
| Legal Responsibility | 31 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 26 |
| Administrators | 16 |
| Policymakers | 7 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Students | 4 |
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
| New York | 4 |
| South Carolina | 3 |
| Texas | 3 |
| Canada | 2 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Kansas | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Louisiana | 1 |
| Minnesota | 1 |
| Missouri | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedManley-Casimir, Michael E. – Administrator's Notebook, 1971
Suggests that individualized justice is a necessary pre-condition to the maintenance of effective student discipline and that the discipline dilemma can be resolved by viewing the administration of student discipline as a problem of discretionary justice. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrators, Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Taylor, George D. – College and University Business, 1971
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Guidelines, Higher Education
Peer reviewedManley-Casimir, Michael E. – Theory into Practice, 1978
This article uses the Supreme Court decision in Goss vs Lopez as a starting point and frame reference for describing and assessing the discipline procedure in one public high school. (DS)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, School Policy
Peer reviewedPierce, Walter D. – School Management, 1971
Appeals of discipline decisions are increasing; the need for set procedures to handle them is increasingly important. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Nolte, M. Chester – American School Board Journal, 1971
Describes procedures required of boards of education by the courts in disciplining students. (JF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Dress Codes, Due Process
Download full textSupreme Court of the U. S., Washington, DC. – 1975
On January 22, 1975, the Supreme Court decided that students facing temporary suspension from a public school have property and liberty interests that qualify for protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Having chosen to extend the right to an education to students, the State may not, without due process, withdraw that…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Secondary Education
Winston, Sheldon – Phi Delta Kappan, 1973
A statement of policy which emphasizes due process but focuses discussion on the expulsion itself. (Author)
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Corporal Punishment, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Norman, Douglas; Stollar, Dewey H. – Tennessee Education, 1971
Suggests methods by which school administrators can avoid lawsuits and can provide due process procedures within the school. (NQ)
Descriptors: Administrators, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Lines, Patricia M. – Inequality in Education, 1972
Argues that suspension of a student from school for disciplinary reasons should always be preceded by a hearing. (JF)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Kobrick, Jeff; Lines, Patricia M. – Inequality in Education, 1972
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, Discipline, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Peer reviewedHestor, Charles – Clearing House, 1977
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Educational Policy, Expulsion
Brownstein, Andrew – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2001
Discusses how Columbia University is rethinking its judicial code after being embarrassed over criticism led by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), a civil liberties group with a flair for public relations. (EV)
Descriptors: Activism, Criticism, Discipline Policy, Due Process
NJEA Review, 1975
Presented some recent supreme court decisions and their meaning for students generally as well as students from New Jersey. (RK)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Due Process, Student Interests, Student Rights
Peer reviewedBall, Mary Adah – School Counselor, 1973
Noting that counselors are seldom able to give legal advice or information to counselors, the author discusses those parts of the federal and state constitutions that deal with due process along with court cases that define and interpret the legal rights of students in this regard. (RP)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process
Inequality in Education, 1973
Summarizes and comments on decisions bearing on students' rights to due process of law in school discipline. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Court Litigation, Discipline, Discipline Policy
