NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Laws, Policies, & Programs
First Amendment1
National Labor Relations…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 42 results Save | Export
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Ciampa, Bartholomew J.
The rights of a teacher in relation to insubordination are discussed in this document. Emphasis is placed on the definition and examples of insubordination. The conclusion summarizes the procedures of insubordination and a teacher's rights when charged with insubordination: procedures include a preliminary investigation, establishment of probable…
Descriptors: Discipline, Due Process, Teacher Behavior, Teacher Discipline
Hudgins, H. C., Jr. – Nation's Schools, 1974
Gives ten "don'ts" coming out of recent court rulings that school administrators should bear in mind before firing a teacher. Issues such as homosexuality, militancy, and insubordination are discussed. (Author/DN)
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Due Process
O'Neil, I. Riley; Adamson, David R. – Executive Educator, 1993
Administrators cannot avoid disciplining and dismissing teachers who lack the skill to teach or the judgment to conduct themselves professionally. Central office administrators at a Salt Lake City school district developed "corrective discipline" procedures to help principals incorporate just cause, due process, and progressive…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Central Office Administrators, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education
Redfern, George B. – Spectrum, 1983
A four-phase process for dismissing unsatisfactory teachers is described: (1) early diagnosis of unsatisfactory performance; (2) initiating a 12- to 14-week plan for improvement of performance; (3) notification of corrective action (list deficiencies, provide assistance, and set a deadline); and (4) implementing termination hearings when all else…
Descriptors: Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Administrator Relationship, Teacher Discipline
Phay, Robert E. – 1972
In 1971 the North Carolina General Assembly enacted a tenure law for the State's public school teachers and principals. Codified as G.S. 115-142, the Act became effective July 1, 1972. It requires local boards of education to adopt "reasonable rules and regulations" for the conduct of hearings on dismissing or demoting teachers and…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Contracts, Due Process, Guidelines
McCormick, Kathleen – American School Board Journal, 1985
The peer review system for evaluating schools (the "Toledo Plan") is gaining favor among teachers in other school systems. Schools are generally reluctant to dismiss incompetent teachers because of documentation complexities, but incompetent teachers should nevertheless be weeded out. (TE)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Due Process, Peer Evaluation, Personnel Policy
Ellis, Thomas I. – 1984
Dismissing incompetent tenured teachers is a difficult and time-consuming task. Contrary to popular opinion, however, that task is not impossible. Effective dismissal of incompetent teachers requires thorough, valid, and well-documented evaluation procedures, appropriate remediation efforts, and a fair hearing prior to dismissal. (TE)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Administrator Relationship
USA Today, 1984
Incompetent teachers must be identified and assisted, and if they fail to improve, they must be dismissed. An eight-point strategy for school district administrators to use in identifying and assisting less competent teachers is presented. (RM)
Descriptors: Due Process, Educational Administration, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education
AAUP Bulletin, 1976
The report of the AAUP Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure regarding the one-year disciplinary suspension of Professor Richard William Rosenbaum for taking four days of unauthorized leave of absence is presented. Procedural and substantive issues of the grievance procedures are reviewed. (LBH)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Due Process, Grievance Procedures, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Scriven, Michael – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1997
A detailed checklist and timeline for ensuring due process are provided for adverse personnel actions, and the need to supplement this with expert, same-jurisdiction legal advice is stressed. This approach emphasizes the importance of treating due process as an ethical as well as a legal requirement. (SLD)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Due Process
Lawrence, C. Edward; Vachon, Myra K. – 1995
This guidebook provides a general overview of procedures that may be followed in staff misconduct situations. Following the preface and introduction, part 1 contains four chapters that present information on general misconduct procedures, serious misconduct requiring immediate suspension, the presentation of a case at a hearing, and misconduct…
Descriptors: Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems
Lawrence, C. Edward; Vachon, Myra K. – 2003
The second edition of this guidebook, written for principals and supervisors, provides a general overview of procedures to follow in staff misconduct situations. Following the preface and introduction, part I discusses general procedures for handling misconduct and includes guidelines for conducting investigations and school-level meetings. Part…
Descriptors: Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 1980
The sequence of events and implications of the disciplinary dismissal of three faculty members of Philander Smith College are discussed with relation to the AAUP's 1940 Statement of Principles. It is concluded that faculty rights were violated by the administration and governing board. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Administrative Policy, Case Studies, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 1980
The denial of tenure to and dismissal of an assistant professor at Nichols College are considered. It is concluded that he was denied due process according to the AAUP's 1940 Statement of Principles. No issue of academic freedom was raised by the decision; however, the administration's action is criticized. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Administrative Policy, Case Studies, College Faculty
Oregon Univ., Eugene. Field Training and Service Bureau. – 1973
This report discusses the new Oregon fair dismissal law, and examines the role of district administrators in the procedures leading to dismissal of certificated staff. The text provides (1) pertinent excerpts from the law, (2) major points of two dismissal case studies showing subtle variables in the dismissal process, (3) suggestions regarding…
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Conference Reports, Costs, Due Process
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3