Descriptor
Day Care | 3 |
Welfare Recipients | 3 |
Economically Disadvantaged | 2 |
Federal Programs | 2 |
Low Income Groups | 2 |
Preschool Education | 2 |
Surveys | 2 |
Welfare Reform | 2 |
Welfare Services | 2 |
Demonstration Programs | 1 |
Evaluation Methods | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evaluation Review | 1 |
Author
Bowen, Gary L. | 3 |
Neenan, Peter A. | 2 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Aid to Families with… | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bowen, Gary L.; And Others – 1991
The Recycling Fund Concept was conceptualized as a special allocation of money for the purpose of expanding child care services for preschool children of low-income parents who were or had been recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. In 1985, North Carolina's Child Care Resources Incorporated…
Descriptors: Day Care, Economically Disadvantaged, Federal Programs, Financial Support
Bowen, Gary L.; Neenan, Peter A. – 1990
This report describes the context, design, and findings of an evaluation of a welfare reform initiative, the Recycling Fund Concept, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed fund would allocate money to parents of preschool children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The concept assumes that lack of child care…
Descriptors: Day Care, Experimental Programs, Low Income Groups, Preschool Children

Neenan, Peter A.; Bowen, Gary L. – Evaluation Review, 1991
This article describes the development of a multifaceted evaluation strategy to assess the effects of guaranteed subsidized child care on the subsequent attainment of welfare independence and aggregate welfare expenditures for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). Advantages of a multimethod approach are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Day Care, Demonstration Programs, Economically Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods