Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Criticism | 2 |
| Beliefs | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Citizenship | 1 |
| Curriculum | 1 |
| Curriculum Development | 1 |
| Educational Objectives | 1 |
| Educational Principles | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Instruction | 1 |
| Learner Engagement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Armstrong, Michael | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkArmstrong, Michael – FORUM: for promoting 3-19 comprehensive education, 2010
The author was disappointed by R. J. Campbell's sour critique of the Cambridge Primary Review in "FORUM" Volume 52 Number 1 2010. His description of the Review's proposals on curriculum and pedagogy as "backward-looking, cumbersome and partial" is such a bizarre misjudgement that it calls for some response. The author comments in turn on R. J.…
Descriptors: Reader Response, Criticism, Program Proposals, Curriculum Development
Armstrong, Michael – Education 3-13, 2011
This article presents the author's response to R.J. Campbell's critique of the "Cambridge Primary Review," which was published in the autumn of 2009. The author argues that Campbell's description of the "Review's" central proposals on curriculum and pedagogy as "backward-looking and inadequately theorised" is so misjudged as to call for a…
Descriptors: Instruction, Citizenship, Ethics, Beliefs
