NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 29 results Save | Export
DeMitchell, Todd A.; Fossey, Richard – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1996
Two hearing boards' finding that a tenured professor's instructional remarks and actions constituted sexual harassment resulted in the filing of a federal lawsuit against the university. Discusses sexual harassment, reviews the most pertinent facts of "Silva," and analyzes the judge's preliminary injunction and summary judgment ruling on…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Court Judges, Court Litigation, Federal Courts
Schimmel, David – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1994
In "Harris" the Supreme Court ruled that Title VII is violated when the workplace environment "would reasonably be perceived and is perceived as hostile or abusive." Schools and colleges, by developing appropriate policies, procedures, and educational programs, can substantially increase understanding about the legal aspects of…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stevenson, David S. – Journal of Law and Education, 1997
Discusses current developments and recent litigation regarding sexual harassment of students by other students. Contends that, despite the discrepancy in recent circuit court decisions of different standards of liability in such cases, this uncertainty should not frighten school officials into abandoning their common sense. (24 footnotes) (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Legal Responsibility, School Districts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McClain, Michael W. – Journal of Law and Education, 1999
Analyzes the state of the law regarding peer sexual harassment. In "Davis" the Supreme Court ruled that a school district can be held liable for a student's sexual harassment of another student. Prior to this, lower courts were not uniform in their treatment of this charge. (Contains 47 references.) (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DeMitchell, Todd A. – International Journal of Educational Reform, 1996
Two federal appellate courts heard cases with similar fact patterns and the same issue--are school districts liable for student-caused sexually hostile environments under Title IX? Since the courts reached different conclusions, this issue seems ripe for consideration by the Supreme Court. No student should have to run a gauntlet of abuse to…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Females
Wilson, Robin – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1990
The Supreme Court's ruling in a flag-burning case raises questions about whether antiharassment policies that colleges and universities have adopted, penalizing slurs and epithets used by students to harass others, violate the First Amendment to the Constitution. If public college policies were found unconstitutional, private colleges would not…
Descriptors: Antisocial Behavior, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Federal Courts
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in "Davis" that a student can sue for damages if school officials know a student is being sexually harassed but fail to intervene. (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Legal Responsibility
Reutter, E. Edmund, Jr. – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1996
Discusses situations that recently received judicial scrutiny regarding clashes between the freedom of the teacher and the freedom of the learner. Each of the following began with a student's objection to an instructional act: (1) freedom to research a religious topic; (2) freedom from racial discomfort; (3) freedom from sexual discomfort; and (4)…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Routh, Joanna L. – Journal of Law and Education, 1999
Now that the Supreme Court in "Davis" has determined that schools can be sued for what one child does to another, schools will have a hard time avoiding frivolous lawsuits. The difficulty of analyzing the "Davis" decision lies in drawing a line between teasing and harassment. The conduct of certain six- and seven- year-olds…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Guidelines
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1986
Outlines important implications for consideration in developing employment policies prohibiting sexual harassment. The recent Supreme Court decision on a sexual harassment case shows that employers are not "insulated" from liability if courts find harassment in the workplace. Also discusses two other Supreme Court decisions. (MD)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Disability Discrimination, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weidner, Donald D. – Journal of Law & Education, 2003
Discusses two recent court decisions--"Urofsky v. Gilmore" and "Bonnell v. Lorenzo"--that concern the role of faculty within the university. Concludes that as the law now stands, faculty have no special First Amendment right to academic freedom. (Contains 93 references.) (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Accountability, College Administration, College Faculty
Leatherman, Courtney – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1997
The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a case that might guide colleges in resolving conflict between campus policies on sexual harassment and free-speech rights. The case involved San Bernardino College (California) and a tenured professor whose explicit classroom discussions college officials felt constituted sexual harassment. An appeals…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Classroom Communication, College Administration, Court Litigation
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1996
In "Rowinsky" the Fifth Circuit ruled that Title IX does not entitle a student to recover damages from a school district for peer sexual harassment. However, three federal district courts and the Eleventh Circuit have joined the trend of holding school districts liable. Follows the Eleventh Circuit's approach and advises school districts…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Females
Elza, Jane – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1993
To forestall sexual harassment law suits, higher education institutions should (1) adopt a position on faculty/student amorous relationships; (2) state clearly how complaints are handled and by whom; (3) actively educate faculty, staff, and students concerning sexual harassment; and (4) follow up any complaints and keep records of the responses.…
Descriptors: Behavior Standards, College Faculty, College Students, Court Litigation
Russo, Charles J.; And Others – West's Education Law Quarterly, 1992
Ruling in "Franklin," the Supreme Court found in favor of a high school student who alleged that she had been subjected to sexual harassment in violation of Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972. Inquires about the nature and scope of damages available under Title IX. Concludes with policy considerations for administrators. (MLF)
Descriptors: Compensation (Remuneration), Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2