Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Constitutional Law | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Criminal Law | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Antisocial Behavior | 1 |
| Citizenship | 1 |
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
| Constitutional History | 1 |
| Crime | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Historical Materials | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Fourth Amendment | 2 |
| Bethel School District 403 v… | 1 |
| Davis v Monroe County Board… | 1 |
| First Amendment | 1 |
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
| New Jersey v TLO | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkSpooner, Kallee; Vaughn, Michael – Journal of School Violence, 2016
One central controversy with youth sexting is that adolescents may be prosecuted under child pornography and obscenity statutes that were originally created to protect children from sexual exploitation perpetrated by adults and do not adequately address consensual teen behavior. Due to this concern, many states have implemented laws specifically…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Handheld Devices, Photography, Telecommunications
Peer reviewedMcMahon, Edward T.; Arbetman, Lee – Update on Law-Related Education, 1984
The exclusionary rule says that any evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officials cannot be admitted in a criminal proceeding. Discussed are where the rule came from, how it works, and the arguments for and against it. (RM)
Descriptors: Constitutional History, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Crime
