NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 220 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jinshui Wang; Shuguang Chen; Zhengyi Tang; Pengchen Lin; Yupeng Wang – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Mastering SQL programming skills is fundamental in computer science education, and Online Judging Systems (OJS) play a critical role in automatically assessing SQL codes, improving the accuracy and efficiency of evaluations. However, these systems are vulnerable to manipulation by students who can submit "cheating codes" that pass the…
Descriptors: Programming, Computer Science Education, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ebru Balta; Celal Deha Dogan – SAGE Open, 2024
As computer-based testing becomes more prevalent, the attention paid to response time (RT) in assessment practice and psychometric research correspondingly increases. This study explores the rate of Type I error in detecting preknowledge cheating behaviors, the power of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence measure, and the L person fit statistic…
Descriptors: Cheating, Accuracy, Reaction Time, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grochowalski, Joseph H.; Hendrickson, Amy – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Test takers wishing to gain an unfair advantage often share answers with other test takers, either sharing all answers (a full key) or some (a partial key). Detecting key sharing during a tight testing window requires an efficient, easily interpretable, and rich form of analysis that is descriptive and inferential. We introduce a detection method…
Descriptors: Identification, Cooperative Learning, Cheating, Statistical Analysis
Leon Katcharian – ProQuest LLC, 2023
Remotely proctored online examinations proliferate in academic and corporate learning environments (Grajek, 2020). Remote (virtual) proctoring allows organizations to efficiently offer tests globally while reducing the costs of proctored testing generally associated with traditional paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing center examinations.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Supervision, Distance Education, Information Security
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Henderson, Michael; Chung, Jennifer; Awdry, Rebecca; Ashford, Cliff; Bryant, Mike; Mundy, Matthew; Ryan, Kris – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2023
Discussions around assessment integrity often focus on the exam conditions and the motivations and values of those who cheated in comparison with those who did not. We argue that discourse needs to move away from a binary representation of cheating. Instead, we propose that the conversation may be more productive and more impactful by focusing on…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Ambiguity (Semantics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang Zhen; Xiaoyan Zhu – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
The pervasive issue of cheating in educational tests has emerged as a paramount concern within the realm of education, prompting scholars to explore diverse methodologies for identifying potential transgressors. While machine learning models have been extensively investigated for this purpose, the untapped potential of TabNet, an intricate deep…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Models, Cheating, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cleophas, Catherine; Hönnige, Christoph; Meisel, Frank; Meyer, Philipp – INFORMS Transactions on Education, 2023
As the COVID-19 pandemic motivated a shift to virtual teaching, exams have increasingly moved online too. Detecting cheating through collusion is not easy when tech-savvy students take online exams at home and on their own devices. Such online at-home exams may tempt students to collude and share materials and answers. However, online exams'…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Identification, Essay Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Becker, Kirk; Meng, Huijuan – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2022
The rise of online proctoring potentially provides more opportunities for item harvesting and consequent brain dumping and shared "study guides" based on stolen content. This has increased the need for rapid approaches for evaluating and acting on suspicious test responses in every delivery modality. Both hiring proxy test takers and…
Descriptors: Identification, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Observation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meljun Barnayha; Gamaliel Gonzales; Rachel Lavador; Jessamae Martel; Ma. Kathleen Urot; Roselyn Gonzales – Psychology in the Schools, 2025
This study examines the determinants of online academic dishonesty using the theory of planned behavior. We surveyed 1087 college students in Central Philippines and utilized a partial least squares-structural equation modeling analysis to evaluate a proposed model. Results demonstrate that 10 of the 11 hypothesized relationships are statistically…
Descriptors: Self Control, Cheating, Intervention, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shengnan Han; Shahrokh Nikou; Workneh Yilma Ayele – International Journal of Educational Management, 2024
Purpose: To improve the academic integrity of online examinations, digital proctoring systems have recently been implemented in higher education institutions (HEIs). The paper aims to understand how digital proctoring has been practised in higher education (HE) and proposes future research directions for studying digital proctoring in HE.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Supervision, Higher Education, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maite Alguacil; Noemí Herranz-Zarzoso; José C. Pernías; Gerardo Sabater-Grande – Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2024
Cheating in online exams without face-to-face proctoring has been a general concern for academic instructors during the crisis caused by COVID-19. The main goal of this work is to evaluate the cost of these dishonest practices by comparing the academic performance of webcam-proctored students and their unproctored peers in an online gradable test.…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Randomized Controlled Trials, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Noorbehbahani, Fakhroddin; Mohammadi, Azadeh; Aminazadeh, Mohammad – Education and Information Technologies, 2022
In recent years, online learning has received more attention than ever before. One of the most challenging aspects of online education is the students' assessment since academic integrity could be violated due to various cheating behaviors in online examinations. Although a considerable number of literature reviews exist about online learning,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Electronic Learning, Educational Trends
Andrea E. Green – ProQuest LLC, 2024
No solution can ultimately eliminate cheating in online courses. However, universities reserve funding for authentication systems to minimize the threat of cheating in online courses. Most higher education institutions use a combination of authentication methods to secure systems against impersonation attacks during online examinations.…
Descriptors: College Students, Cheating, Online Courses, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Philip M. Newton; Keioni Essex – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
Academic misconduct is a threat to the validity and reliability of online examinations, and media reports suggest that misconduct spiked dramatically in higher education during the emergency shift to online exams caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reviewed survey research to determine how common it is for university students to admit…
Descriptors: Cheating, Tests, Electronic Learning, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Reddy, Leelakrishna; Letswalo, Machaba Leanyatsa; Sefage, Amanda Percy; Kheswa, Bonginkosi Vincent; Balakrishna, Avula; Changundega, Jesman Moreblessing; Mvelase, Mashinga Johannes; Kheswa, Khayelihle Allen; Majola, Siyabonga Ntokozo Thandoluhle; Mathe, Themba; Seakamela, Teffo; Nemakhavhani, Thendo Emmanuel – Pedagogical Research, 2022
Integrity and quality of assessments on the online platform should be upheld to ensure that it supports student learning as well as the efficacy of teaching because in the end it measures the reputation of an institution. How institutions have traversed such domains remains a grey area. This paper provides anecdotal insights into how staff from a…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Foreign Countries, College Faculty
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  15