NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Conijn, Rianne; Kleingeld, Ad; Matzat, Uwe; Snijders, Chris – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2022
Background: Online and blended learning need an appropriate assessment strategy which ensures academic integrity. During the pandemic, many universities have chosen for online proctoring. Although some earlier examples suggest that online proctoring may reduce cheating, the potential side-effects of proctoring are largely unknown. Objectives:…
Descriptors: Supervision, Computer Assisted Testing, Integrity, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Tobias Haug; Franz Holzknecht; Wolfgang Mann – Language Education & Assessment, 2024
This study investigated through an online survey how sign language practitioners changed their sign language assessment practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey consisted of five sections and 29 questions overall. It was provided in written English and German as well as in International Sign and was administered online between October…
Descriptors: Sign Language, COVID-19, Pandemics, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arnold, Ivo J. M. – Journal of Economic Education, 2022
The author of this article uses two empirical approaches to compare online to face-to-face proctored assessment. Using data from a Dutch economics program, he shows that the relationship between grades and human capital variables remains highly significant for courses with online proctored examinations. Additionally, a search for suspicious grade…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Supervision, Evaluation, Synchronous Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Okada, Alexandra; Noguera, Ingrid; Alexieva, Lyubka; Rozeva, Anna; Kocdar, Serpil; Brouns, Francis; Ladonlahti, Tarja; Whitelock, Denise; Guerrero-Roldán, Ana-Elena – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2019
Checking the identity of students and authorship of their online submissions is a major concern in Higher Education due to the increasing amount of plagiarism and cheating using the Internet. The literature on the effects of e-authentication systems for teaching staff is very limited because it is a novel procedure for them. A considerable gap is…
Descriptors: Audits (Verification), Plagiarism, Cheating, Internet
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Whitelock, Denise; Edwards, Chris; Okada, Alexandra – Journal of Learning for Development, 2020
The EU-funded TeSLA project -- Adaptive Trust-based e-Assessment System for Learning (http://tesla-project.eu) -- has developed a suite of instruments for e-Authentication. These include face recognition, voice recognition, keystroke dynamics, forensic analysis and plagiarism detection, which were designed for integration within a university's…
Descriptors: Computer Security, Electronic Learning, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bao, Yingying; Chen, Guanliang; Hauff, Claudia – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2017
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a promising form of online education. However, the occurrence of academic dishonesty has been threatening MOOC certificates' effectiveness as a serious tool for recruiters and employers. Recently, a large-scale study on the log traces from more than one hundred MOOCs created by Harvard and MIT has identified…
Descriptors: Large Group Instruction, Online Courses, Cheating, Incidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics